"Crisis level deficit spending" leading up to war with Russia

Editor's note: Those inside the Biden corporate power structure because it's not an "American government" are working intensely nonstop to start a war with Russia before the 20th of January. All the stops have been pulled including dropping missiles into Russia, targeting Russia's "shadow fleet" of tankers, sabotaging undersea cables, directing attacks on Russian military assets in Syria, assassinating Russian generals and economically harassing Russia. The next 20 days are going to be critical and hopefully Russia will be restrained after listening carefully to Russia's Sergey Lavrov until after the 20th. All this money being pumped into Ukraine under the Biden corporate government is "crisis level deficit spending" adding another binge spending episode (including on Covid and mass immigration) borrowing from the future to ensure these people aggressively moving towards war to win. The "binge spending" on Ukraine gets washed back into US and European weapon manufacturers. In this regard as far as Europe is concerned, NATO is correct in "looking for more cemetery space" because they will need it. The US-UK-NATO triumvirate of the central banking warfare model refer to this as "war games" while Russia calls it war and are prepared to wage it.

Thousands of British soldiers to take part in NATO war games on border of Ukraine
________

How the people behind Joe Biden are trying to unleash another big war at any cost

The Biden administration wants to put as many obstacles as possible in the way of the new US President Trump before the change of power in the USA. It is obviously trying to unleash a major war against Russia in several places.

by Anti-Spiegel | December 30, 2024

To say it right away, because it is very important for understanding: It is not Joe Biden who makes the decisions in Washington, as even the Wall Street Journal has now reported without contradiction, but according to the newspaper, the decisions are made by White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

 

Threatening charges of high treason

The decisions in Washington are therefore made by unelected officials who derive their own legitimacy only from working for the demented president, whom they steer in the direction they want. And these gentlemen are provoking situations that completely bypass the decision-making power of the US Congress, which, according to the US Constitution, decides on war and peace. To put it clearly: According to the US Constitution, what the Blinken/Sullivan duo has done and continues to do is high treason.

Why this is the case and what the two gentlemen have been trying to do in recent weeks to unleash a hot war against Russia is what this article is about.

The Role of the Media

Incidentally, the events since the summer have once again shown how aligned the Western media are. First, they kept Joe Biden's dementia, which has been evident since the 2020 election campaign, a secret from their audience for four years, only to then address it (as if) on command because the US Democrats wanted to replace Biden as their presidential candidate and the issue therefore had to make the headlines.

But after the Western media also openly acknowledged Biden's dementia, not a single journalist from the liberal, pro-Democratic media asked how such a demented man, who cannot even hold a discussion with his political opponent, could remain in office as US President.

It is now clear to everyone that Joe Biden is not ruling the USA. And the uncontradicted report in the Wall Street Journal answered the question of who has actually been ruling the USA since Biden took office four years ago, but this was largely ignored in the German media.

But let's get to the real issue, namely the fires that Blinken and Sullivan are continuing to stoke in order to put obstacles in Trump's path and also save their own skin from being charged with treason. To do so, they are even risking a hot war with Russia.

submarine cable

Western media and politicians are currently running a campaign because some data cables were damaged in the Baltic Sea. There is no evidence, but of course they blame Russia and say things like, this can't be a coincidence, so it must be sabotage and of course only Russia could be responsible.

The fact that the same media want to blame the explosion of the Nord Stream on Ukraine, and that there are certainly other suspects for cases of sabotage in the Baltic Sea who even have an interest in accusing Russia, is something that Western media naturally fail to mention in this context.

To understand the issue, we should first ask ourselves how likely sabotage is, and this includes the question of how often such cables are damaged per year. I found an interesting article on this on the BBC, which is not known for "Russian propaganda". In the article, the BBC reports that there are 150 to 200 such damages every year and that this is so normal that a whole fleet of special repair ships is ready for this in strategically selected ports around the world.

I quote the interesting parts of the BBC article:

"There are 150 to 200 failures in the global network every year. So if we compare that to 1.4 million km, it's not a lot, and when that failure does occur, most of it can be repaired relatively quickly." (...) Most failures, which vary between 70 and 80% depending on where in the world the cables are located, are related to unintentional human activities such as dropping anchors or dragging trawl nets that get caught on the cables, says Stephen Holden, maintenance manager for Europe, the Middle East and Africa at Global Marine, a subsea engineering company that carries out repairs to subsea cables. These typically occur at depths of 200-300m (but commercial fishing is increasingly moving into deeper waters - down to 1,500m in some places in the North East Atlantic). Only 10-20% of failures are related to natural hazards and more commonly involve cables wearing out in places where they rub against rocks due to currents around the world, causing what are known as 'shunt failures', Holden says. (...) When a failure is detected, a repair vessel is dispatched. "All of these vessels are strategically placed around the world so that they take 10 to 12 days from base to port," says Mick McGovern, assistant vice president of marine operations at Alcatel Submarine Networks."

So we can say that it is quite normal for submarine cables to be damaged and that this is hardly a big surprise, especially in the relatively shallow Baltic Sea, through which many cables have been laid and which is actively fished. But of course the Western countries do not mention this in their current reports, which are intended to blame Russia.

Please go to Anti-Speigel to continue reading.