Coronavirus: what real science would look like, if it existed
Now figure out what the risk and reward is to investors on these bonds when WHO declares the coronavirus a "pandemic?" What is the criteria for declaring a "pandemic"? Ever wonder why Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was decided on to head WHO? The reason why is because he is a proxy to take the heat on a demonstrably incompetent and terribly inefficient corporation that burns through $2 billion a year. The World Bank is pushing hard for universal healthcare (UHC) and to achieve this under globalization, pandemics will need to be created by the available technology to hammer the world into globalization. President Trump just announced all flights between America and Europe will be cancelled for one month. That just put a serious crimp in globalization. Then listen carefully to Trump saying "this is to protect our nation and other countries." We published the following Slate article below once before but guess we will put it back up in light of coronavirus propaganda going mainstream. Plans already drawn up and ready to go by you know who, WHO:
2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019‐nCoV): STRATEGIC PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE PLAN
The media today is nothing more than one big global marketing combine tossing out fake news faster than a printing press spits out brand new fiat $100 bills in the basement of the US Treasury. If any country does this better than anyone it is the British, not the spitting out of $100 bills, the info commercials like for example on this current coronavirus. The British have elevated their manipulation of the news through such orgnaizations as the Strategic Communications Laboratory (SPL) to the level of a consummate propagandistic art form under the cover of "news" through the magic of words to create commerce. How do we know China isn't working with the City of London on this coronavirus world-wide scare to bring health care under global control? After all, Britain has allowed Huawei into Britain to set up Huawei's 5G network. This isn't anything conclusive but it leaves people wondering about the UK-China relationship.
Formed in the 1990s the Strategic Communications Laboratory (SCL) PR firm discussed below is the parent company of Cambridge Analytica (subsidiary of SCL; data mining and data analysis) and a key British antagonist in the Trump-Russia hoax media bombardment. Go back and review history: The Rockefeller Foundation-funded and Princeton University-applied War of the Worlds. It scared people sh*tless back then only today we have the misfortune of instantaneous fear porn through the internet and social media. You are a bug and your participation in mass behavior (behavioral dynamics) for data results is being collected, collated and analyzed (data the new commodity). If SCL services military customers, it means there is no difference now between civilian and military psychological warfare. It is quite surprising considering the owners of Slate even put an article up like this in 2005. Want to see an example of fake news and spreading fear in the population? Read this sh*t from Breitbart News. If you get your news from Breitbart News you are one seriously compromised individual:
Experts: China Carving Lungs Out of Political Prisoners to Treat Coronavirus
Tim Evans, the Director of Nutrition and Population at the World Bank. Healthcare in the hands of financial technologists as the World Bank kept pushing for more financing. These people are saying because of globalization there will be increasing numbers of pandemics. These people seem to be saying that the only way they can get the financing they want is for some type of galvanizing event.
The Event 201 took place last year October 18, 2019 in New York 74 days before the first reports of the coronavirus outbreak on December 30, 2019 in Wuhan, China. Event 201 was sponsored by the John Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Tim Evens gives his presentation beginning at the 11:16 point. The bottom line is this group is looking for money to finance the consequences of a pandemic. Tim Evans mentions a "global retraction of the global economy." This is about surrendering national control to a globalist organization like WHO by coercing countries to cough up money to get financing to be used to fight a global pandemic.
News update for 12 March 2020: Breathe! Don't Succumb to the Pathological Hysteria from the Coronavirus Madness
What most people do not realize is the World Bank has had military personal and people who ran the Pentagon on their staff. Admiral Stephen C. Redd who attended Event 201, is the Director of the Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Redd says that "it will be really important that this not be seen as a health event, [pandemic] but as a global crisis." What does that tell you? It tells you these people are not concerned about health but with globalization and control. Here is something really important to comprehend when viewing these clips from Event 201. At no time did they discuss the need for doctors, emergency vehicles or healthcare workers, or how to handle potential civil unrest that might be critical in the planing in the event of a pandemic. These "experts" have a definite planned agenda and that is to source financing for a world body.
You see, in this line of work it's all about the flow of money. Now, despite all these tests, where is the science? We want to see the science on the tests that have already been done. We demand transparency. Admiral Stephen C. Redd is the Director of the Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) mentioned above. The military inside the CDC?! They don't give a crap about health. That's why those men behind that table are so aloof in their responses when grilled by Rep Katie Porter.
Coronavirus: what real science would look like, if it existed
_______I did the math: a full battery of coronavirus testing costs at minimum $1,331.— Rep. Katie Porter (@RepKatiePorter) March 12, 2020
I also did the legal research: the Administration has the authority to make testing free for every American TODAY.
I secured a commitment from a high-level Trump official that they’d actually do it. pic.twitter.com/RmolCtmNbG
Source: Slate
Psy-ops propaganda goes mainstream.
By SHARON WEINBERGER | SEPT 19, 2005
LONDON—Over the past 24 hours, seven people have checked into hospitals here with telltale symptoms. Rashes, vomiting, high temperature, and cramps: the classic signs of smallpox. Once thought wiped out, the disease is back and threatening a pandemic of epic proportions.
The government faces a dilemma: It needs people to stay home, but if the news breaks, mass panic might ensue as people flee the city, carrying the virus with them.
A shadowy media firm steps in to help orchestrate a sophisticated campaign of mass deception. Rather than alert the public to the smallpox threat, the company sets up a high-tech "ops center" to convince the public that an accident at a chemical plant threatens London. As the fictitious toxic cloud approaches the city, TV news outlets are provided graphic visuals charting the path of the invisible toxins. Londoners stay indoors, glued to the telly, convinced that even a short walk into the streets could be fatal.
This scenario may sound like a rejected plot twist from a mediocre Bond flick, but one company is dead set on making this fantasy come to life.
Strategic Communication Laboratories, a small U.K. firm specializing in "influence operations" made a very public debut this week with a glitzy exhibit occupying prime real estate at Defense Systems & Equipment International, or DSEi, the United Kingdom's largest showcase for military technology. The main attraction was a full-scale mock-up of its ops center, running simulations ranging from natural disasters to political coups.
Just to the right of the ops center, a dark-suited man with a wireless microphone paces like a carnival barker, narrating the scenarios. Above him a screen flashes among scenes of disaster, while to his right, behind thick glass, workers sit attentively before banks of computer screens, busily scrolling through data. The play actors pause only to look up at a big board that flashes ominously between "hot spots" like North Korea and Congo.
While Londoners fret over fictitious toxins, the government works to contain the smallpox outbreak. The final result, according to SCL's calculations, is that only thousands perish, rather than the 10 million originally projected. Another success.
Of course, the idea of deluding an entire city seems, well, a bit like propaganda.
"If your definition of propaganda is framing communications to do something that's going to save lives, that's fine," says Mark Broughton, SCL's public affairs director. "That's not a word I would use for that."
Then again, it's hard to know exactly what else to call it. (Company literature describes SCL's niche specialties as "psychological warfare," "public diplomacy," and "influence operations.") The smallpox scenario plays out in excruciating detail how reporters would be tapped to receive disinformation, with TV and radio stations dedicated to around-the-clock coverage. Even the eventual disclosure is carefully scripted.
In another doomsday scenario, the company assists a newly democratic country in South Asia as it struggles with corrupt politicians and a rising insurgency that threatens to bubble over into bloody revolution. SCL steps in to assist the benevolent king of "Manpurea" to temporarily seize power.
Oh, wait, that sounds a lot like Nepal, where the monarchy earlier this year ousted a corrupt government to stave off a rising Maoist movement. The problem is, the SCL scenario also sounds a lot like using a private company to help overthrow a democratically elected government. Another problem, at least in Nepal, is that the king now shows few signs of returning to democracy.
The company, which describes itself as the first private-sector provider of psychological operations, has been around since 1993. But its previous work was limited to civil operations, and it now wants to expand to military customers.
If SCL weren't so earnest, it might actually seem to be mocking itself, or perhaps George Orwell. As the end of the smallpox scenario, dramatic music fades out to a taped message urging people to "embrace" strategic communications, which it describes as "the most powerful weapon in the world." And the company Web page [no longer online] offers some decidedly creepy asides. "The [ops center] can override all national radio and TV broadcasts in time of crisis," it says, alluding to work the company has done in an unspecified Asian country.
The government's use of deception in the service of national security is not new. During World War II, for example, Allied forces conducted a massive misinformation campaign, called Operation Fortitude, designed to hide plans for the Normandy invasion. More recent efforts have met with controversy, however. In 2002, the Pentagon shuttered its brand new Office of Strategic Influence after public outcry over its purported plans to spread deceptive information to the foreign press.
Government deception may even be justified in some cases, according to Michael Schrage, a senior adviser to the security-studies program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "If you tell the population that there's been a bio-warfare attack, hospital emergency rooms will be overwhelmed with people who sincerely believe they have all the symptoms and require immediate attention," Schrage says.
The problem, he adds, is that in a democracy, a large-scale ruse would work just once.
The U.S. government has generally sought to limit disinformation; some agencies—such as the CIA—are explicitly prohibited by law from misleading domestic press. And while the CIA is fond of concealment, it takes pride in the belief that truth is necessary for an open government, a sentiment chiseled into the agency's lobby.
A successful outcome means thousands, not millions, will die in a catastrophe.What makes SCL's strategy so unusual is that it proposes to propagate its campaign domestically, at least some of the time, and rather than influence just opinion, it wants people to take a particular course of action. Is SCL simply hawking a flashier version of propaganda?
The spokesman’s answer: "We save lives."
Who buys this stuff? Broughton declined to mention many specific clients, noting that disclosing SCL's involvement—particularly in countries with a free and open media—could make its campaigns less effective. However, he says that post-apartheid South Africa has employed SCL. So has the United Nations, he says.
The company's Web site is even vaguer, mentioning international organizations and foreign governments. A Google search produces only a handful of hits, mostly linked to the company's Web site. The company's work is based on something that even the spokesman admits you "won't find on the Web": the Behavioral Dynamics Institute, a virtual lab led by Professor Phil Taylor of Leeds University.
But the company, which is funded by private investors, is now taking on a higher profile, and visitors flocked to the flashy setup here at the show. "Basically, we're launching ourselves this week on the defense market and homeland security market at the same time," Broughton explained.
If SCL has its way, its vision of strategic communications—which involves complex psychological and scientific data—could be used to shape public response to tsunamis, epidemics, or even the next Hurricane Katrina.
Well aware that the company may face controversy, particularly with its push into the defense market, Broughton emphasizes the company's role in saving lives.
Please go to Slate to read the entire article.
________
Ed.'s note: Think of yourself as one "bug" in a petri dish and you along with every other "bug" in the same petri dish are being clinically studied and the resulting data collected. The data is collected on mass behavior of all these "bugs". Bugs are pretty predictable though and perhaps uninteresting in terms of our example of mass behavior. So instead, imagine the data being collected on people in stores fighting over toilet paper within the population on their overall mass behavior in this "war of the coronaviruses?" Are you afraid?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.