The Crunch Is Back, There's Going To Be A Gold Standard, And It Will Be Disastrous
________
About Phil Hudok, Et Alia....
By Anna Von Reitz | October 2, 2019
It's another flap over nothing, and for the same reason all the other "progress" has always gone nowhere.
As David Straight teaches, you have to have "status" and "standing" and "jurisdiction" ---- he is telling you all the same thing I have been telling you for twenty years or more.
So now you have two people standing up and telling you the truth, and you have all these other people like Phil Hudok and NLA still running around in circles and encouraging you to do the same.
Get a clue.
I could go get an Arbitrator to agree with me any day of the week, but it wouldn't matter. Why? Because if I were Phil Hudok, and hadn't done my paperwork, I wouldn't have status or standing to complain. I wouldn't even be party to the contract. A sharp Arbitrator would know that, but he found someone who wasn't up to speed. So, if you didn't recognize the situation, as his Arbitrator didn't, and as Arbitrator, you sided with him ---- guess what? Neither one of you would have jurisdiction.
As a result, none of this goes anywhere. It's not enforceable. Why? Because you have to have what? Status, standing, and jurisdiction.
By going through all the Turkey Trot to declare yourself an American State National eligible to serve as an American State Citizen, you establish your political status. Now you join your State Assembly and become recognizable as a State Citizen, and therefore one of the People, and also therefore a Party to the Federal Constitutions --- able to enforce those contracts. Now, you have standing, too.
Just by doing what you have already done as part of The American States Assembly effort, you have established status and standing to enforce the Constitutions. Now, you have to establish jurisdiction.
So what is your jurisdiction? Answer: land and soil jurisdiction, plus, the un-delegated "reserved" powers in the international jurisdiction of the sea that are the subject of Amendment X.
All that is yours and all that stands under American Common Law.
Now, finally, you have what it takes to go forward and enforce the Constitutions on the land and soil of this country. The bases have been covered. You have status, you have standing, and you have jurisdiction.
And now what? The actual Public Law is enforceable locally and nationally within each State as a result of our efforts, but what else is necessary? Answer: actual people and courts to do the enforcement.
So we have our Continental Marshals Service up and rolling in every State of the Union. These people are enforcing the land jurisdiction, which is international in nature, involving activities taking place across state borders. They are already sinking their teeth into issues like drug smuggling, human trafficking, interstate bank and foreclosure fraud, kidnapping, unlawful conversion, and more. They are already working with the U.S. Marshals and the Constitutional Sheriffs to put an end to these major international crimes that have afflicted millions of Americans, and they are already securing your constitutional rights.
On the local level, we have our Constitutional Sheriffs Association, and more Sheriffs are joining as it becomes clear that they have a Public as well as a Private duty to serve.
Even though the corporations providing us with "governmental services" have contrived to protect themselves at our expense by unlawfully converting our Public Offices into private security positions (aka, Law Enforcement instead of Peacekeeping jobs) the people occupying those positions are waking up and making use of Sheriff Mack's hard work in the U.S. Supreme Court case, Mack and Prinz v. USA, Inc., in which the court admitted that the right of all Sheriffs, LEOs or not, to enforce the Constitutions. And they are biting back and bringing home the Public Law we are owed.
What more needs to happen? The State Assemblies need to fill their Juror Pools, organize their Jural Assemblies and State Militias, and hold their Public Elections for actual State Offices, beginning with their Court Officers. You can't enforce American Common Law without duly elected Justices, Clerks, Coroners, Sheriffs, and Bail Bondsmen. So, inform and educate enough Americans to get the positions filled and the job done.
Bear in mind that peacekeeping officers (elected and commissioned) outrank all law enforcement officers on the land and soil of this country, so once you elect a Sheriff to serve the soil jurisdiction of your County, he outranks any elected or appointed law enforcement officer --- including any "County Sheriff" elected by U.S. Citizens --- people acting in a capacity as if they were born in Puerto Rico, or any "citizens of the United States" --- people acting as if they were born in Washington, DC.
America still belongs to Americans, we just have to wake up and realize the lies that have been shoveled about us, and take action to repudiate those lies. And after that, we have to organize, organize, organize as indicated above, so that we are truly "self-governing" again, upholding our own jurisdiction, and operating our government as it is supposed to be operated.
We have figured it all out. We know what it takes to bring lawful relief and the actions we need to take both as individuals and as Assemblies operating at both State and County levels. There's no more guessing or researching to be done about these matters and no point in chasing around doing anything else any other way.
We can't hope to get anywhere functioning as isolated "Grand Juries" hanging in thin air, comprised of people who haven't even declared their political status as Americans.
We can't hope to gain international recognition when we still don't know and demonstrate that we know how our own government is organized and what our jurisdiction is.
We can't hope to get relief from these foreign courts operating as privateering organizations on our shores, until we have our own courts in place. This is what Milligan Ex Parte is all about--- when our civilian courts stand up, their quasi-military courts have to stand down.
So what are we waiting for? The people organizing under The American States Assemblies program are doing it right. We have our status, standing, and jurisdiction lined out, and every day, we make more actual and factual progress.
We are --right now-- implementing programs for people to identify their private automobiles on the public roads with Property Plates instead of license plates.
We are -- right now--- implementing a new ID system in which you will own your own alpha-numeric ID code, and no longer be dependent on Social Security Numbers and other identifiers that in fact misidentify you as foreigners merely "residing" in your own country.
The American States Assembly has it together and these other groups simply do not. So why waste your time and risk your freedom messing around with groups like the NLA and Michigan General Jural Assembly and chasing after "relief" that isn't ever going to solve the actual problems?
Don't ask me about Phil Hudok. Show me the money and proof that this not just another Big Rock Candy Mountain story.
Don't tell me about "Grand Juries" that aren't part of any actual Court and don't even know what jurisdiction they are supposed to be operating in---which describes NLA, all these years later after its founding.
Don't ask me to support groups like Michigan General Jural Assembly that don't recognize the necessity of declaring the political status of their members as American State Nationals and organizing their actual State Assemblies, of which the Jural Assemblies are merely one (important, but not sufficient) part.
Status. Standing. Jurisdiction.
The American States Assembly organization is the only group out there that has its ducks in order, that is already successfully enforcing the constitutional guarantees, and already taking care of the legitimate business of government ---- which is protecting your rights and private property.
If you want to enforce your constitutional rights, if you want to protect your private property interests, if you want the wrong-doers arrested and held to account, then it is more than past time to stop running pillar to post among all the bad choices and failed organizations that are out there.
Get your status straight. Join your State Assembly. And enforce your jurisdiction on the land and soil of this country.
Don't waste time, money, or effort doing anything else.
_________
Response to Anna von Reitz by Phillip Hudok:
Source: Arbitration Information
October 5, 2019
Anna,
Evidently, you didn't read the documents that have been available for everyone to view on my website:
www.hudok.info
The contents of the 12/7/2018 Proof of Claim is the proof.
You should know better than to be caught making a claim so easily destroyed. Please don’t wrongly influence others.
After your "Get a clue" attack in the snippet below of the multipage page email you sent out, I will list pages 44-48 of the Proof of Claim document. If there is no malicious intent, do your homework if you want anyone to believe you.
Sincerely,
Phillip Hudok
Field McConnell hosts & Phil Hudok Discusses Treaty of Peace 2020-How To
Phil Hudok explains Treaty of Peace 2020 - Abel Danger & Field McConnell 10/7/19
Treaty of Peace 2020 - A gift from God? Escape and Final Victory?
WOW, God Bless These Patriots.
Link to video source posted above:
http://hudok.info/
________
Why Peace Treaty 2020 Won't Work
By Anna Von Reitz | October 10, 2019
Don't get me wrong. It's a fine idea.....but.....
For a Treaty to be valid you need to have certain things straight, and as with everything else these guys are doing or attempting to do, they don't have the verbiage straight. They are still confused by the similar names deceit, and as a result, they keep making the same mistakes.
As I observed about Phil Hudok. He didn't reclaim his rightful birthright as an American by his actions. He reclaimed his birthright as a British Territorial United States Citizen ---- as if he had been born in Guam. And that's why the King's Courts are so willing to give him succor and relief as a poor Pauper of the Commonwealth coming before the King's Bench for relief --- as in "welfare relief".
The same kinds of mistakes are self-evident in the Peace Treaty 2020 document, so that's a non-starter from the beginning. So that is one insurmountable issue. Another is that in order for a peace treaty to work and be valid, you have to have the correct parties signing it---- and for the moment, that is as impossible now as it was 150 years ago. The American Civil War was a Mercenary Conflict fought on our soil by two opposing sets of Federal Service Providers. The Big Dogs in the fight were the members of the Confederation formed by The Articles of Confederation in 1781, what we call "the North and South" or, "the Union and the Confederacy".
In fact, both the North and South were members of the original Confederacy, so it is more proper to think in terms of the Northern Confederation vs. the Southern Confederation.
It's also necessary to know that these "Confederate States" were not "States" in the sense that we typically think of the word, and also, were not our States of the Union.
They were the original American States of States operating as businesses to provide our States and People with services at the federal level.
So you have actual States that are members of our Federation of States, and you have States of States that are supposed to function as members of the Confederation. Apples and oranges. Actual States and States of States.
It was the original States of States business organizations that fought the Civil War.
So, The State of New York went to war with The State of South Carolina, for example, and these were the entities that conducted the entire war.
You can easily prove this by looking at the war rosters of men being inducted into the service on both sides of the conflict. They were mustered out as companies representing "The State of ___________".
These powerful business interests were the primary combatants, but both the Territorial and Municipal United States "Federal Service Providers" also got involved.
The Territorial United States entity dba "the" United States of America sided with the North. The Municipal United States entity dba "the" United States sided with the South.
Thus, to have a valid Peace Treaty ending the conflict, the parties to it would have to be fighting an actual declared war -- which they weren't, and all the parties would have to sign it, which is impossible because the Confederate States --- both North and South --- ceased functioning.
The Northern Confederacy was bankrupted in 1863, and the Southern Confederacy was "ruined" and rendered unable to function by the Grand Army of the Republic, and neither one was ever reconstructed.
So, the Big Dogs in the fight are no longer present and in a condition to sign a Peace Treaty, even if a Peace Treaty were the appropriate instrument to end a Mercenary Conflict ---- which it is not. [What you are looking for, is a "Peace Accord" similar to what they did in Vietnam.]
Their respective allies, the British Territorial United States dba "the" United States of America and the Municipal United States dba "the" United States are still present, but they've turned all this into a big joke and used it as an excuse to continue a totally bogus "war" on our shores ever since.
Pending the Reconstruction, of course.
The reason that I call the continuing mercenary war between the British United States and the Municipal United States "bogus" is that they are both working for the Pope and always have been.
The Territorial Government works for him indirectly, and the Municipal Government works for him directly, so the whole thing is a spoof played from both ends against the middle.
The Queen manages the British Commonwealth for the Pope, so she is the Pope's employee in this matter, and the Municipal Government works directly for the Pope, so you are treated to the spectacle of two Roman Catholic business entities "fighting" each other for profit.
And an entire civilian population owed their "Good Faith and Service" being pillaged and plundered by their own employees using these specious excuses.
So what you are actually looking for is called a "Peace Accord" and in order to get it, you have to reconstruct the American States of States, both North and South.
All right, well, the Government of the People, by the People, and for the People is a living government composed of Lawful Persons defined as State Citizens ---- living Americans who accept their Public Duty and populate the actual States of the Union by serving the State Government in various capacities ----Jurors, Deputies, Justices, and so on.
Our first obstacle is that thanks to continuing Gross Breach of Trust on the part of the Popes and British Monarchs, we have all been deliberately misidentified and mis-characterized as either Territorial United States Citizens or Municipal "citizens of the United States".
According to them, this entire country is populated by Federal Employees. And if you believe that, I have some Florida real estate to sell....
This results in a situation wherein we have to go back and deliberately, knowingly correct our political status records.
After we go through all that Turkey Trot and notify the United States Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, we can function as State Citizens, can organize our actual States, and can then "reconstruct" the American States of States, both North and South.
But even though we must do our best to accomplish this whole task of assembling our States and reconstructing our States of States (which we are doing) that is still no guarantee of peace.
Why? Because the Pope, that Diva of Peace and Love [purportedly], continues to make commercial war against us under these deplorably and inexcusably False Pretenses. His employee in this matter, Elizabeth II, continues on with the charade.
His other employee in this matter, the Secretary General of the United Nations, is playing his part to a "t" and cannot be trusted to act as our Trustee ---- a set up engineered by Jimmy Carter's Administration --- because he, Antonio Guterres, is a lifelong subject of the Pope.
I almost burst out laughing when I heard Pope Francis sanctimoniously saying that we must obey the United Nations --- that is, obey his employee, Antonio Guterres.
It's the same game, folks. Whether it is the British Queen indirectly doing the Pope's bidding, or the Secretary General of the United Nations indirectly doing the Pope's bidding.
It all comes down to the gross malfunctioning of the Roman Curia and the Roman Catholic Church and the Office of the Pope.
If you want peace in this world, you have found the epicenter of perpetual war --- the so-called "Church Militant"--- and you now have a firmer grasp on what you are really dealing with.
May all the Roman Catholics reading this wake up and realize just how despicable and two-faced the behavior of the "Church" has been on this and on many, many other occasions ---- and take action accordingly.
May all the world leaders reading this wake up and deal with the situation at the United Nations, which is being primed as the new "store front" for these hypocrites.
May all the Americans reading this wake up and reclaim their political status as Americans; all of us who are not in the military nor in the Federal Civil Service at this time, are free to repudiate all claims that we are any species of Federal Citizen at all.
Unless you all want to live under the thumb of the Inquisition and under the control of a dirty theocracy run by hypocrites, it's time to convince the Pope that the whole carefully planned set up is blown.
And as for Mr. Trump? He can do what Andrew Johnson did, and create a binding commercial contract on the rats by three times Declaring the Peace in Public.
It will take a concerted effort on all our parts to ride herd on the members of Congress to make sure that such a Peace is honored, but it can be done internally, and Mr. Guterres will be obligated to obey our internal Peace Accord.
If they welch on it, every country in the world will know who to bomb and who to avoid as business partners and allies.
The Brits appear to be waking up after a very long slumber and so do the erstwhile members of the Commonwealth.
We have 27 of our States of the Union assembled and populated --- a majority position capable of conducting business for The United States of America. And more Americans are waking up to the clear and present danger every day.
If you want peace, not only in our country, but throughout the world --- get off your duffs, and start chewing on the elephant in the center of the dining room.
More:
Silly People
Again, About the Arbitration by Phil Hudok and Others
To the Flag Officers:
By Anna Von Reitz | Monday, October 7, 2019
I have been accused of "not answering" your questions. I have in fact answered your questions and it behooves you to study the answers.
These answers are being made Public and Published so that nobody can misrepresent the situation or a word I say. If you have any other questions, forward them to me; otherwise, I and everyone else in the world will assume that you have in fact and in truth been answered, and that you now understand fully what you are dealing with and what your duty is.
Question 1: Who administered my "Oath of Office"?
I am a Justice of the Peace, an Officer of a State of the Union ---- not a "State of State". We do not now and never have taken "Oaths" of Office. We honor the Separation of Church and State, as clearly enunciated in Everson v. Board of Education, and also honor the Law of the Land, which in the western world means the Bible, which forbids the taking of oaths.
Both these foreign practices, oath-taking and impersonation in office, originate under the international law of the sea. As a result, the only judges who take Oaths of Office are Federal Judges---either outright while sitting on a US Federal Court bench, or as a Jurist for Hire working for an enfranchised State of State. Those who serve the actual State simply "accept" the Office we are elected to serve as a Public Duty. If you were familiar with the history of the judiciary and land law, you would already know this.
I am working for the State as defined here at (1), not a STATE OF STATE member of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ---the definition listed as (5):
1856- A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856.
(1) Definition of United States of America: The name of this country. The United States, now thirty-one in number, are Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and California."
(5) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The United States of America are a corporation endowed with the capacity to sue and be sued, to convey and receive property. 1 Marsh. Dec. 177, 181. But it is proper to observe that no suit can be brought against the United States without authority of law.
Please note that Bouvier's is the only Law Dictionary ever adopted for use by the Congress and it is therefore the controlling authority in these matters.
Second, as you know, only Bar Attorneys may serve in Federal Courts and "federalized" --- that is, incorporated State of State Courts. This is because they deal in international law of the sea and in global law of commerce. The definition of "bar attorney" taken from an 1801 British Merchant Marine Handbook is "international shipping clerk". They are supposed to function as Customs Agents aboard ship or be employed in Customs Houses on land. Now, it doesn't take a great deal of intelligence to determine that we are not aboard ship and I am not involved in administering anything in a Customs House, either. The better question is --- what in the hell are all these foreign shipping clerks doing here in our court buildings? And the answer is: the extension of the international law of the sea onto the land is a trespass that was allowed as an "Emergency" measure by the Congress acting in 1865 --- a trespass that has never been adequately corrected because the Reconstruction was never completed. If you were familiar with the history of the establishment of the Federal [Military] District Courts, you would know this, too.
Here is where the Sea Courts came ashore:
March 2, 1867 (14 Stat. 428), divided the ten Southern states into five military districts, each to be commanded by an officer not below the rank of brigadier general. Under the act the primary duties of these commanders were "to protect all persons in their rights of person and property, to suppress insurrection, disorder, and violence, and to punish, or cause to be punished, all disturbers of the public peace and criminals."
Ever since, the use of these courts has expanded, even though they are by definition foreign with respect to our civilian population and lack valid jurisdiction.
That does not mean that our land jurisdiction courts ceased to function, merely that sea courts became common and people forgot (as the present question proves) the difference between land and sea courts. Third, as you may have cause to know, in 1819, an Amendment to The Constitution of the united States of America was ratified by the States, prohibiting anyone in receipt of foreign titles of nobility from occupying any public office in our Federal government. That includes Bar Attorneys who are all in receipt of the title "Esquire". Though the States are not bound by the contracts of the States of States, we felt it best to honor this prohibition and not allow land jurisdiction justices to be members of the Bar, which creates a natural conflict of interest, and is inappropriate and unnecessary anyway, as we don't practice the law of the sea in our courts.
I hope this adequately explains: (1) why neither I nor any other Justice of the Peace takes an "Oath" of Office; and (2) why our civilian courts practice land law, not sea law; and (3) why our Justices don't have or don't retain any membership in the Bar Associations.
We, the actual Justices of the civilian courts in this country have NEVER taken "oaths" of office for the reasons I have brought to your attention, so the whole presumption that I would take an Oath of Office or that it would be administered in the manner you presume, is faulty from the get-go.
2. I have no "relationship" with the current Pope, Francis, other than to serve as a vocal critic and reminder of his obligations. I had no "relationship" with Benedict XVI, either, other than a private appointment to speak on his behalf to his employees in the Municipal United States Government, and give them Notice that they are operating in "gross error" ---- in direct conflict with their duty owed to the American States and People and in violation of their employment contract.
I am not Roman Catholic. I am a member of the Universal "Catholic" Church at Large, so my business with either Pope is strictly business, and specifically, enforcement of contracts owed to Americans. I brought Benedict's attention to the misconduct of the Municipal United States Government, including The Dead Baby Scam, and did so in a way that required him to either take action against it, or be exposed as a willing accomplice to the fraud and mistreatment we have suffered.
He responded by trying to reorganize and correct the Postal District system, including the Postal District Courts, liquidate the UNITED STATES, INC. for criminal activity, and sending myself and about 900 others out into the world to tell his adherents and employees to cease and desist their impersonation of living flesh. These practices are against both ecclesiastical law and our constitutional agreements.
The present Pope doesn't appear to care that this is so, and is bent on moving these illicit operations to a new storefront location --- the United Nations. Instead of doing away with the criminality, Francis is trying to protect and continue and expand it. This has nothing to do with religion, nor with politics in any common sense of these words; we are dealing with crime on a global and staggering level. 147 corporations are involved in an interlocking trust directorate scheme aimed at manipulating and controlling everything, destroying all conventional religions, and all national governments. Under Francis, no corrective action has been taken to dismantle or redirect these colluding corporations.
The Flag Officers need to get off their duffs and (1) realize that they have been left clueless and (2) ask themselves why?
I would venture to guess that they have been left clueless so as to better manipulate and misdirect them. The objective of these 147 corporations and their managers is to rule the world. They are doing this under a guise of peace and love and saving the Earth from climate change and overpopulation---- but in fact, their goal is to create a worldwide system of Corporate Feudalism operated by an oppressive theocracy---- and that theocracy is not Christian. It's a pagan leftover from the days of Rome and it goes even further back, to Babylon.
My question back to the Flag Officers is, "If a Great-Grandma from Big Lake, Alaska, can see what's going on, why can't you?"
3. How is my husband the Head of State for The United States of America?
Get out your trusty Bouvier's Law Dictionary again. Look up the word "President". Tell me what you see? A President by definition is the Chief Executive Officer of a business enterprise, not a Head of State. Yet, every country in existence in the 1700's had to have a Head of State in order to function---- and the people who were functioning as Heads of States were all snobs, so they required that all Heads of State must be of royal lineage or have attained sovereignty by force of arms.
George Washington wanted the plum of acting in the power position of President of the United States ---- comptroller of the Pope's Municipal Government, because even back then, he realized that that was where the real power was and also the greatest threat.
George was a Cousin of King George III and a direct descendant of King John, who was "King of the British Commonwealth".
It's important that you grasp the fact that there has not been a true British Monarch since 1066, and William the Conqueror made sure that there never would be again. Upon his death in 1087, he rewarded his loyal Norman Barons by making them all "sovereigns in their own right" and bequeathing them permanent landholdings throughout England. They remained Barons and under fealty to him and his progeny in France, but in England they were all kings in their own right. He did not give his son, John, any land at all---- hence, John's nickname, "John Lacklands".
John was, however, the hereditary Grantor of the Commonwealth ---- the waste lands and properties granted by the former kings of England to the Church to be developed and used for the support of the poor and infirm, and the Normans respected the Church holdings. John had a little spat with the then-Pope, which resulted in a role reversal. Instead of him acting as Grantor and letting the Church develop his lands for their purposes, he became the Church's Administrator, responsible for overseeing the Commonwealth lands. This is the primary Office the Queen still occupies --- Queen of the British Commonwealth --- and the only office related to the land that John's progeny are heirs to. This is where King John became a tool for the Pope, and this is also how all the British Monarchs from John's line also became tools of the Popes, regardless of their religion.
Because the Norman Barons were now "sovereigns in their own right" in England, they and their progeny had the lawful power to create the Magna Carta and enforce it, no matter what King John and his heirs wanted. This is where my husband's family, or to be more specific, his clan, inherited their sovereignty. They were all kinsmen of William the Conqueror, all part of the Belle Cher clan --- like a Scottish Clan. The head of the Clan is called "the" Belle Cher as an office, similar to "the" MacDonald.
Our Forefathers were much more aware of this history than we are today. Nobody objected to George Washington being the President and overseeing the Pope's Municipal Government; as a descendant of King John, he was naturally fitted for that Office and acceptable to the Pope. However, the former Colonists balked at having Washington also serve as Head of State. That was a bit too close to the King of England, and they certainly didn't want to get embroiled with the King of France..... or the King of Spain, which would just lead them back into a lot of European intrigue.
John Adams was a neighbor of the Belchers who lived in Braintree, Massachusetts. They introduced him to William Belcher, "the" Belcher at that time, a Colonel in the Continental Army who served at White Plains and diverse other battles. William was a "sovereign in his own right" under the terms of The Settlement of the Norman Conquest and thus enabled to serve as our country's Head of State. That's why the Great Seals of both The United States and The United States of America are visibly and actually part of the Belcher Array of Arms ----- take a good look at the various Belcher Coats of Arms and tell me what you see?
Just as his ancestor William, the Conqueror, had done in England, William Belcher declared during his lifetime that all the men who served in the Continental Army and all the children born on the land and soil of this country, would be "sovereigns in their own right" forevermore. This is memorialized in his Will, using the same basic language as used to convey such sovereignty by William, the Conqueror.
Instead of there being just a few leftover Norman scions, there were now potentially millions of Americans standing as inheritors through the Norman Conquest, heirs to the Magna Carta, all enabled as "sovereigns in their own right". William clearly meant for this to be the death knell of monarchies everywhere and for elitism in general. He believed that mankind is capable of self-government, and believed in the principles enunciated by Thomas Jefferson in The Unanimous Declaration of Independence.
That is how and why William Belcher became Head of State and also how and why Americans became "sovereigns in their own right".
Now, this is not an answer that some Flag Officers loyal to the Queen will want to hear, but it is nonetheless the truth. The present Queen readily admits that we are a "sovereign people" and does not dispute a word of this testimony and evaluation of the rights and standing involved, so it isn't a matter for her employees and officers to dispute in her behalf.
So let that sink into the pates of the Flag Officers.
They may work for the Queen, but the Queen works for us. That is how the "Delegation of Powers" is even possible. If you think about it for five seconds, you will realize that a king does not accept delegation, except from another king.
Americans are sovereigns in their own right by force of arms upon the land and soil of this country, and inheritors of the Magna Carta and sovereignty in their own right internationally via their inheritance preserved by the Norman Conquest---- through William Belcher.
You will note that all this occurs and is only important in the realm of international and global diplomacy. It has nothing to do with the day to day affairs of average Americans and by all rights, should never be anything but a source of empowerment and joy for everyone concerned---- if and when it does become important----- as it has now.
We are facing an international crisis caused by the gross criminality cited in the Answer to Question 2 ---- an attempted criminal corporate take-over of all national governments, led by the banks and the run amok Roman Catholic Church, that clearly sees this as an opportunity to create a worldwide theocracy for itself. By the end of this month, Brexit or no Brexit, the UNITED KINGDOM (INC.) will be forced to turn over control of the British Armed Forces to the fiends in Brussels --- the UN Corporation, the stinking Vichy French and Swiss Nazi Collaborators. Unless, that is, the Flag Officers get off their dead asses, support the actual civilian government owed to this country, and bring forward our claims ---- because in fact we are the Priority Creditors of the UNITED KINGDOM and we, not Brussels, have the deciding vote.
________
Related:
Further Clarification for the Flag Officers and Everyone Else:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/10/further-clarification-for-flag-officers.html
More to the Flag Officers:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/10/more-to-flag-officers.html
The Big Fraud in Very Simple Terms:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2019/10/the-big-fraud-in-very-simple-terms.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.