News update for 16 July 2021: BREAKING: First Major Call For Biden Electors to be Recalled in Arizona, Demand for New Election
The Big Lie Revealed
________
Source: Washington Times
Capitol Police to use Army surveillance system on Americans to 'identify emerging threat'
It should be fairly obvious by now considering the staged events and circumstances of January 6th, 2020 (irregular military warfare operation) that the British and the Pentagon (the FBI is also run by the SES) do not want domestic tranquility.
The American Republic vs. the British Empire - Freedom or Slavery
The Big Lie Revealed
________
Source: Washington Times
Capitol Police to use Army surveillance system on Americans to 'identify emerging threat'
In this file photo, National Guard troops keep watch on the Capitol, Thursday, March 4, 2021, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
By Joseph Clark | The Washington Times | Saturday, July 10, 2021
U.S. Capitol Police will begin fielding military surveillance equipment as part of sweeping security upgrades as the force becomes "an intelligence-based protective agency" after the Jan. 6 attack.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin recently approved a Capitol Police request for eight Persistent Surveillance Systems Ground - Medium (PSSG-M) units. The system provides high-definition surveillance video and is enabled with night vision. The system does not include facial recognition capabilities, the Pentagon said.
Some privacy rights advocates have raised concern that Capitol Police are getting into the business of spying on Americans.
In a wartime application, the persistent surveillance units were mounted on tethered blimps. The data could be stored, combined with sensor data from other platforms, and later referenced or rewound to track individuals or groups.
The military could use the system to develop "pattern of life" analyses on suspected enemy combatants or intelligence targets in war zones. It could determine, for example, who was responsible for placing an improvised explosive device.
The Department of Homeland Security has leased the same or similar technology, described as Persistent Ground Surveillance System(s) (PGSS), through the Department of Defense, according to a 2016 Government Accountability Office report. It is not clear whether any other agency has fielded the exact technology domestically.
A federal appeals court ruled last month against the Baltimore Police Department's use of persistent surveillance technology similar to the Pentagon's Gorgon Stare, which incorporates wide-area motion imagery pods mounted on aircraft. The system allowed police to track hundreds of moving targets at once throughout a large geographical footprint. The court said the program was unconstitutional and violated the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure.
The technology used in the pilot program in Baltimore, known as Aerial Investigation Research, was owned by a private company and the pilot program was privately funded. The technology allowed the police department to capture up to 12 hours of footage per day.
An independent audit team from New York University's School of Law found that the Baltimore Police Department retained a significant amount of imagery from the surveillance system and used the footage to track individuals for multiple days.
Capitol Police provided few details when The Washington Times asked for specifics about how and where the department will use the PSSG-M equipment. The agency would not say whether the data will be stored or disseminated or whether the system will be used only for real-time observation.
The Pentagon said the Army will install the units and train Capitol Police officers to operate and maintain the system. The Army will not operate the units once they are installed.
When asked whether data from the PSSG-M system would feed to agencies besides Capitol Police or how specifically the fielding of the system would improve upon Capitol security infrastructure, the department declined to respond.
"Hopefully, you can understand it wouldn't be smart of us tell the world all our capabilities," a Capitol Police official told The Times.
As an agency of the legislative branch, U.S. Capitol Police is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act.
Lynne Bernabei, a lawyer based in Washington who specializes in civil rights litigation, said Capitol Police use of the PSSG-M technology does not immediately raise civil liberties concerns. Given the extraordinary circumstances of the Jan. 6 attack, she said, the use of the technology could be legitimate.
Please go to Washington Times to read more.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin recently approved a Capitol Police request for eight Persistent Surveillance Systems Ground - Medium (PSSG-M) units. The system provides high-definition surveillance video and is enabled with night vision. The system does not include facial recognition capabilities, the Pentagon said.
"This technology will be integrated with existing USCP camera infrastructure, providing greater high definition surveillance capacity to meet steady-state mission requirements and help identify emerging threats," the Pentagon said.The technology allowed U.S. troops fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to monitor large areas 24/7 through extremely high-resolution cameras.
Some privacy rights advocates have raised concern that Capitol Police are getting into the business of spying on Americans.
In a wartime application, the persistent surveillance units were mounted on tethered blimps. The data could be stored, combined with sensor data from other platforms, and later referenced or rewound to track individuals or groups.
The military could use the system to develop "pattern of life" analyses on suspected enemy combatants or intelligence targets in war zones. It could determine, for example, who was responsible for placing an improvised explosive device.
The Department of Homeland Security has leased the same or similar technology, described as Persistent Ground Surveillance System(s) (PGSS), through the Department of Defense, according to a 2016 Government Accountability Office report. It is not clear whether any other agency has fielded the exact technology domestically.
A federal appeals court ruled last month against the Baltimore Police Department's use of persistent surveillance technology similar to the Pentagon's Gorgon Stare, which incorporates wide-area motion imagery pods mounted on aircraft. The system allowed police to track hundreds of moving targets at once throughout a large geographical footprint. The court said the program was unconstitutional and violated the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure.
The technology used in the pilot program in Baltimore, known as Aerial Investigation Research, was owned by a private company and the pilot program was privately funded. The technology allowed the police department to capture up to 12 hours of footage per day.
An independent audit team from New York University's School of Law found that the Baltimore Police Department retained a significant amount of imagery from the surveillance system and used the footage to track individuals for multiple days.
Capitol Police provided few details when The Washington Times asked for specifics about how and where the department will use the PSSG-M equipment. The agency would not say whether the data will be stored or disseminated or whether the system will be used only for real-time observation.
The Pentagon said the Army will install the units and train Capitol Police officers to operate and maintain the system. The Army will not operate the units once they are installed.
When asked whether data from the PSSG-M system would feed to agencies besides Capitol Police or how specifically the fielding of the system would improve upon Capitol security infrastructure, the department declined to respond.
"Hopefully, you can understand it wouldn't be smart of us tell the world all our capabilities," a Capitol Police official told The Times.
As an agency of the legislative branch, U.S. Capitol Police is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act.
Lynne Bernabei, a lawyer based in Washington who specializes in civil rights litigation, said Capitol Police use of the PSSG-M technology does not immediately raise civil liberties concerns. Given the extraordinary circumstances of the Jan. 6 attack, she said, the use of the technology could be legitimate.
Please go to Washington Times to read more.
________
With sweeping new powers why are the US Capital Police (USCP) expanding beyond Washington DC? From what we can tell the USCP has become a paramilitary unit with federal policing powers to "identify emerging threats." The US military will not be fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan any longer but will be fighting irregular warfare on Americans for the British. This military surveillance of the US population is all based on the faked and staged events of January 6th, 2020.
Unaccountable & Armed With Sweeping Powers: What's Behind US Capitol Police Expansion Beyond DC?
With sweeping new powers why are the US Capital Police (USCP) expanding beyond Washington DC? From what we can tell the USCP has become a paramilitary unit with federal policing powers to "identify emerging threats." The US military will not be fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan any longer but will be fighting irregular warfare on Americans for the British. This military surveillance of the US population is all based on the faked and staged events of January 6th, 2020.
Unaccountable & Armed With Sweeping Powers: What's Behind US Capitol Police Expansion Beyond DC?
This is British tyranny inflicted on Americans. What this discussion means listening to the content is that the British presence is unknown through the Pentagon related to voting fraud/control in Arizona.:
As an example of British control over the Pentagon, was the movie Black Hawk Down. This movie was produced and directed by Ridley Scott. Scott is a British film producer and director. Black Hawk Down (2001) psychologically prepped/conditioned an entire generation of susceptible American youth to be used as canon fodder to smash through the Middle East and now look what it has culminated in today? The US leaving Afghanistan with the country turned over to the Taliban now forging alliances with China. This is not an "American" plan for the Middle East; this is clearly the British plan.
The British have a cadre of operatives in the US through the Senior Executive Service (SES) running the command and control structures at the Pentagon.
The flag representing the enforcement of maritime admiralty law through the SES at the Pentagon for the private law merchants located in the City of London.
It should be fairly obvious by now considering the staged events and circumstances of January 6th, 2020 (irregular military warfare operation) that the British and the Pentagon (the FBI is also run by the SES) do not want domestic tranquility.
Related:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.