Monday, December 7, 2020

Covid-19 Vaccination The Big Ifs

Editor's note: There is now a discussion to try and persuade Americans into taking the Covid-19 vaccine by bribing them with a $1,500 payment. A former presidential candidate and former U.S. Rep. John Delaney, D-Md. has a plan for getting people skeptical of a coronavirus vaccine to get the shots: pay them $1,500. Why would Delaney suggest a $1,500 bribe to take the Covid vaccine (injectable) for a $1,500 payment? Simple. Back in 2014, Delaney in the US Congress from Maryland at the time had concerns thousands of jobs in Maryland would have been at risk if Pfizer had completed a buyout of UK-based pharmaceutical firm AstraZeneca.

$1,500 stimulus check proposed to get Americans to take the coronavirus vaccine

Pfizer's quest for AstraZeneca becomes political theater as MPs probe $106B offer
________

Source: LewRockwell.com

What if thousands of healthcare workers are vaccinated first and have side effects and are in sick bay all at the same time. It could be a catastrophe. 

By Bill Sardi | December 7, 2020 

A commonly heard presumption is that healthcare workers should be vaccinated first. But what if…….

……….the vaccines induce immediate or latent adverse reactions that sideline these first responders and frontline workers? It could be a catastrophe. And if for some reason the vaccines spread COVID-19 rather than quell it (there is such a thing as vaccine-induced infection), what a way to create an out-of-control pandemic. Some of the vaccines are just weakened (attenuated) COVID-19. Just what is in the vaccine if COVID-19 hasn't been shown to exist and the test for it is so unreliable it has created pseudoepidemics? No one can fathom just how fraudulent this pandemic is. Everything related to COVID-19 is a false prop.

Regardless of how "safe" or effective a vaccine is among healthy Americans, only 12% of Americans are metabolically healthy. One study reveals 45% of American adults have chronic disease and are at increased risk for complications associated with COVID-19 and vaccination.

Every doctor, nurse and laboratory technician becomes a Trojan horse as they go back home and spread the virus, or whatever else is in the vaccine. These are experimental vaccines, rushed to market. The immunized are guinea pigs.

The US Code, the Helsinki Agreement and the Nuremburg Code protect citizens from forced vaccination by codifying the right to consent to or refuse vaccination when experimental vaccines like COVID-19 are being employed. The public won’t be informed of these legal protections.

What we have today is coerced consent (no travel, no job, no money). Are healthcare workers going to keep their jobs if they object to vaccination?

Are frail, mentally impaired residents at nursing homes who can no longer take care of their own affairs, able to understand a vaccination consent form?

According to a December 1, 2020 issued recommendation, both healthcare workers and residents of long-term care facilities should be "prioritized" to receive immunization against COVID-19, under the presumption healthcare workers and nursing home residents will plead for the vaccine. But health authorities anticipate 4 out of the first 7 licensed COVID-19 vaccines will fail.

About 29% of patients with COVID-19 are health-care workers and were assumed to have acquired their infection in the hospital.

Polls indicate 37% of healthcare workers themselves would be hesitant toward COVID-19 vaccination. Another study reveals only 27% of healthcare workers would accept a COVID-19 vaccine when it becomes available.

What if……… mass vaccination in nursing homes results in deaths among the frail elderly? The first time Medicare covered the cost of flu shots in nursing homes in 1993 there was a flu epidemic in care homes that killed thousands.

Residents and staff of long-term care facilities account for 6% of COVID-19 cases but 40% of the deaths. This is due to the advanced age and weak immunity of nursing home patients.

Healthcare workers and nursing home patients represent about 24 million people.

Because vaccine effectiveness depends on the quality of the immune response, persons with weak immune systems, such as very young infants and elderly persons, are likely to be insufficiently protected even with the best vaccines. For example, protection against influenza virus strains is only 29%–46% in persons aged older than 75 years, compared with 41%–58% in persons 60–74 years of age.

What if…….. vaccination creates a problem called immune enhancement whereby a person is vaccinated against one disease and later is exposed to that same pathogen (virus or bacterium) again and develops more severe disease than they would have if not vaccinated.

What if a vaccine produces more cases of COVID-19 than less? Don't say that is impossible – – more polio cases are now caused by vaccination than by a wild virus in the community.

What if…….. a post-vaccination inflammatory syndrome occurs in large numbers? Certain vaccines may produce brain inflammation that result in symptoms of fever, restlessness, anorexia and out-of-control emotions (acute crying).

What if……. There are so many severe side effects emanating from vaccination that these cases fill up hospital wards and are mistakenly reported to represent cases of COVID-19, which is largely diagnosed by symptoms, not a lab test.

Please go to LewRockwell.com to read the entire article.
________


Pfizer has been working with the Chinese conglomerate Fosun International on a Covid vaccine:




Take the time to listen to a Wyoming Department of Public Health Official discuss the new COVID Vaccine and how the vaccine is different from anything else compared to all other vaccines. If you don't view the video clip then at least have a look through this related material: 


In the UK vaccines have always been about commercial private interests profiting off the manufacture and sales of vaccines.







No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Looking into our circumstances...