Why you should be against the ICANN handover

Jimstone.is | September 13, 2016

"Hillary herself said she'd shut down Alex Jones and Breitbart. How would that be possible with today's internet? It would not be possible. But Hillary was not talking about today's internet; she was talking about the internet after her inauguration, which is AFTER THE HANDOVER. And if ICANN really does get full power with no oversight, the likes of Hillary really will get their wish. It will be ADIOS to ALL OF IT."

Here are the BIG indicators that the internet handover will be bad:

1. Google and Facebook are for it. And what are Google and Facebook? Nothing but tech parasites who contributed nothing other than control and censorship to the internet. So what if Aunt Edna can post her brownie pictures to Facebook and Clarita can post baby pics for FREE – when those types of things mean NOTHING to an evil control freak who will then turn around and block all political truth and true public discourse? Let's see something go truthfully viral on Facebook that is not Jew-approved. The mere thought is worth a laugh.

Here is a Google internet experience, in a nutshell: Surf porn? Bingo! You will get it in droves. Google loves you to waste your life with that. But the nanosecond you start surfing out political topics, or tech topics, Google turns into a massive funnel that produces nothing but Jew- and elite-friendly results – and for anything technical, bashes you straight into paywalls or totally fake fronts that do nothing but try to funnel you into favoring certain products. You will get nowhere with Google if you do anything like try to figure out the chemistry of ________________.

10 years ago, you could get the answer to anything like that, and now Google will funnel you straight into bold-faced lies specifically crafted to engineer failure in all of your efforts no matter how benign. And that is a serious threat to Western civilization: yes, if you don't have a billion-dollar budget, you will not be designing much of anything if you don't already have the facts as to how that can be accomplished. Google really will funnel you straight into failure.

How did I figure that out? Because years ago I was experimenting with asymmetrical capacitors and got the facts on the dielectric constants of practically everything. The king of all dielectrics was barium strontium titanate (BaSrTiO3), and now Google will only produce fraudulent results that tell you that barium titanate alone holds the top spot, and then list the old results for barium strontium titanate in place of barium titanate. That is a specific detail that I knew for certain, and Google frauds it, ON PURPOSE. Zero legitimate results for BaSrTiO3 film, plates, powder, sintering temperatures, NOTHING – and if you did not know the truth ahead of time, you'd never know Google produces only fraud now. That proves they are EVIL. And if that kind of evil wants ICANN handed over – the kind of evil that goes way beyond politics and will lie about science – the ICANN handover cannot possibly be good.

Perhaps Google will (temporarily) fix that one topic because I mentioned it. But what about the 5,000,000 other topics? ADIOS.

Do I really need to go into how Facebook frauds and censors everything, and why their favoring the ICANN handover can't possibly be a good thing? Facebook might possibly represent the death of the web, even if there was no handover.

2. The handover is the "brainchild" of Obama. No one asked for it. No one pushed for it. No one even thought of it, until one day Obama announced it would be done. And on whose authority? NO AUTHORITY. The President can't just do that; yet it got done, which means it is a shadow government move. A New World Order move. Why would anyone want that?

Congress can still block it, but it looks to me like that won't be happening, despite all the news reports to the contrary. Congress is in bed with the shadow government – and like Obama and Hillary, is working hard to destroy freedom and kill America off once and for all.

FACT: All of Congress is against Trump, because Trump is not an "insider". That's their only reason: "He's not one of us." GEE, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN – "one of us"? Ohh, I get it: he's not the shadow government, and might undo a ton of "progress". Progress in their efforts to destroy America. THAT'S IT: so don't bet on Congress doing jack to stop the ICANN handover from passing; if Congress does manage that, it will prove the infiltration is not complete. Don't bet on it.

Here is the future of the web with ICANN handed over: Say one difficult truth about the Jews, and you are GONE like a CNN reporter who said the truth about Hillary's health. If you do want to stay online and you are not political, count on huge licensing fees and a massive wall of red tape, where getting online to post anything at all will be like applying for a home loan with full background check. Perhaps you will be able to post to Facebook, no problem; but if you step out of line, you will be vaporized and possibly visited by INTERPOL. I don't know why the world is not freaked out about this.

Hillary herself said she'd shut down Alex Jones and Breitbart. How would that be possible with today's internet? It would not be possible. But Hillary was not talking about today's internet; she was talking about the internet after her inauguration, which is AFTER THE HANDOVER. And if ICANN really does get full power with no oversight, the likes of Hillary really will get their wish. It will be ADIOS to ALL OF IT.