Thursday, June 23, 2016

Crooked DHS Cofounders, 9/11 Perps, Dual (Israeli–US) Citizens Michael Chertoff and Joe Lieberman - DHS: Dump of Horse Shit - A Malevolent Make-Pork Project - Americans: If You Value Your Freedom, Abolish the Criminal, Fraudulent, Treasonous Department of Homescam Security

It Is Time to Defund and Abolish the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) 

Militia News | March 14, 2014 | 15 Comments


Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was formed as a result of the 9/11 attacks, when 19 jihadists, Radical Muslim terrorists, most of whom came from Saudi Arabia, who were armed with box-cutter knives, took over passenger planes and flew them into the Pentagon and the Twin Towers. [Commanded by Osama bin Qaeda with a Nintendo keypad, while hooked up to a dialysis machine in a cave in Afghanistan. Right. More like organized by some of the treasonous cretins, such as radicalized Judaist terrorists Joe Lieberman and Michael Chertoff, who founded DHS.]

Since its awkward birth in 2003, it's safe to say the baby never learned to walk, or stopped flinging its food or sucking its thumb. [Or undermining the American republic.] But it has grown. An umbrella agency that now incorporates 22 different agencies and components with some 240,000 employees, it has survived mostly because of natural bureaucratic intransigence; but fed also by the lingering specter of 9/11, which gives it near-impenetrable political security. It is currently receiving appropriations of $39 billion for fiscal year 2013 (and that is after sequestration). [It sure is comforting to note that treason can be so lucrative for a few, right?]

Of course, most of that money goes to DHS components that were independent or part of other agencies before DHS came along. They include the U.S. Coast Guard, the Secret Service, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Federal Protective Service, Customs and Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and everyone's friend, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).

Full Body Scanner image of a female passenger

But some $4.5 billion of the total budget goes to front office operations and programs, as well as new DHS directorates created after 2003. They involve department management, research and development, security training, the inspector general's office, the Office of Health Affairs, Analysis & Operations, and a Domestic Nuclear Detection Office. And don't forget its cybersecurity directorate – every agency's got one! – for which it's getting more than half a billion dollars a year to operate. In other words, the DHS administration has become a bureaucratic planet unto itself [Uranus?], and no one can deny it.

Case in point: the old St. Elizabeth's mental hospital in Washington, the site of the (still unfinished) new 4.5 million square foot DHS headquarters, in 2011. I was told by my handlers that the old imposing 19th century main hall, which used to house hundreds of patients and the administration of the hospital – the size of two football fields – would be, once refurbished, for the secretary's staff only. Another major hall would be for the agency's lawyers. The rest of the 14,000 employees from other components would be working elsewhere on the 176-acre property.

St. Elizabeth's Main Hall, future home to DHS secretary's staff

Ben Friedman over at Cato called DHS a "bureaucratic monstrosity," and there are plenty of people outside and inside government who would agree with him. Isn't it time to consider that this experiment – inspired by the politically driven, essentially emotional, misplaced need to do something after the 9/11 attacks, and fueled accordingly by neoconservative grandstanders like Sen. Joe Lieberman (D) and Rep. Peter King (R), who have used the new agency and its corresponding congressional committees as a platform for anti-Muslim tirades and more government intrusion into our lives – has failed?

Putting aside all of the money the government would save, getting rid of the Department of Homeland Security would be a first step at scaling back post-9/11 domestic counterterrorism and law enforcement hubris – not to mention the militarization of domestic security. They've already begun testing domestic drone surveillance (in addition to the military blimps and aerostats, drones are already used on the border and in the "Drug War"), and the agency is always on the lookout for the best in spy camera technology – because, of course, they are looking out for our best interest. DHS has also helped local police build up their own armories by giving them money to buy military surplus. "The buying spree has transformed local police departments into small, army-like forces, and put intimidating equipment into the hands of civilian officers," wrote Andrew Becker for The Daily Beast in 2011.

The problem with the DHS administration is that it doesn't have a clear mission beyond coordinating homeland security efforts already exercised by its major components and working with outside agencies – FBI, the Pentagon, the Centers for Disease Control, state and local homeland security offices, etc. – to share information, launch joint programs, training, policy, whatever.

One of the agencies it helped to get on its feet was the new TSA – and from day one, DHS has fumbled and bumbled down the runway, from the enormous amount of money lost in failed contracts, to the conveyor belt of bad press regarding the screening procedures (like old ladies and toddlers getting humiliating pat-downs while explosives and guns sail through checkpoints time and again during undercover inspections).

For the last several years, millions of fliers have endured full-body scanners that snap near-naked pictures of their bodies while they "stick 'em up" obediently in something that resembles a mini-transporter, but is infinitely not as cool. DHS has insisted these machines are safe and necessary (ironically, the Rapiscan models that ex-DHS chief Chertoff lobbied for when he left the agency to go into the private sector are being pulled from the airports – more millions wasted – because they emit the more dangerous ionizing radiation). But officials still can't guarantee that full-body scans will detect all explosives hidden on the human body, leading many of us to wonder uneasily about what fresh tortures TSA may have in store for us down the road.

Abel Danger Presents: TSA Toilet Safety Administration (South Park) 

Zionist Scumbag Michael Chertoff Gets Pounded With 9/11 Questions 

Joe LIEberman: WTC 7 Collapse Didn't Happen... No New Investigation 


Meanwhile, the ACLU is demanding more information about DHS agents detaining thousands of individuals at the borders each year, confiscating their laptops and other electronic devices, even when there is no suspicion of wrongdoing. From the ACLU in May:

Essentially, DHS has adopted a policy of peering into anyone's data, at any time, for any reason. Through a FOIA request filed three years ago, we discovered that more than 6,500 travelers had their devices searched under this policy between October 2008 and June 2010. Almost half of those were U.S. citizens.

Flying, to many Americans, has become a very stressful undertaking – and forget it if you're suddenly put on the "no fly list" by mistake – the DHS redress program, which is supposed to help get you scrubbed from the list (supposedly 21,000 names strong as of 2011, double from the year before), has done nothing of the sort for anyone, according to critics.

Meanwhile, DHS has invested upwards of $1.4 billion on state/regional fusion centers but cannot account for how it was spent, according to a scathing Senate report last fall. That report accuses DHS of not only of wasting money, but it called the information the fusion center was generating "oftentimes shoddy, rarely timely, sometimes endangering citizens' civil liberties and Privacy Act protections, occasionally taken from already-published public sources, and more often than not unrelated to terrorism." At the time, The Washington Post paraphrased the report, calling the centers "pools of ineptitude, waste and civil liberties intrusions."

A bevy of law enforcement representatives, as well as then-Sen. Lieberman, who you could easily call the father of the fusion centers, leapt to DHS's defense. But it is hard to say you are not spying on Americans when you have state fusion center officials like this guy in Arkansas, clearly admitting they are monitoring "anti-American" organizations without warrants. The ACLU has been tracking these centers, too, calling them a "force multiplier for spying in local communities."

During the Occupy Wall Street rallies, individuals from DHS's Federal Protective Services were spotted on the scene at numerous city events, because of course, a domestic protest movement regarding the dirty nexus between Wall Street and the state are a threat to the homeland. FPS agents showed up again to greet Tea Party protesters across the country in May. Later, hundreds of documents obtained through numerous FOIA requests showed widespread DHS surveillance of the Occupy movement, and even internal recognition that what they were doing may not be constitutional.

Add all of this to the scandals that have plagued both the DHS administration, as well its components (the Secret Service prostitution affair being the worst in recent years, but some of the smaller ones hurt the agency just as much over time). But don't expect Congress to get to the bottom of any of it. The way the agency is structured, some 100 committees have oversight jurisdiction over DHS, proving the old adage that having too many cooks in the kitchen makes for a crummy stew that no one will have to take the blame for.

DHS also remains the agency with lowest morale among its employees, year after year, since the agency's inception. The lack of training, budgets, leadership have all been fingered, but we really need to throw in the fact employees answer to two masters – their component heads and DHS – and there is so much turnover at the top, so much ambiguity about what this umbrella organization is supposed to be doing, that it creates a culture of detachment and confusion, thus the low morale.

In other words, the bureaucracy is really a threat to its own mission – dare we say a threat to national security? It's certainly become a threat to us, costing Americans more in coin and liberty every day. This is nowhere more evident than in DHS's recent attempts to gain more access to Internet data in its new cybersecurity efforts. We already have our hands full with NSA. The time to address the future of DHS is now.

It is clear that the DHS is not in the business of protecting us; it is in the business of protecting criminals and keeping us controlled. It is time to defund and abolish it, sell all of its assets and ammo, and return all the proceeds to the U.S. treasury for partial repayment of our debt. [In fact, the so-called "national debt" needs to be repudiated, and the Federal Reserve must be abolished also. New money can and should be issued as a utility to all citizens, in an equal amount, at a regular interval – so as to stimulate the domestic economy, reward entrepreneurship, and democratize the monetary system. The electoral franchise means little without the monetary franchise. But you need to DEMAND this – it will not be handed to you, especially by Federal Reserve mobsters!]

http://www.militianews.com/time-defund-abolish-dhs/

Sourced from:

Time to Abolish DHS? Napolitano's exit may be an opening for change by Kelley B. Vlahos, July 30, 2013


Further resources:

Federal Reserve 

Clinton NWO 

Zionist Crimes 


The Soft Boys - He's A Reptile 

The Soft Boys - I Wanna Destroy You 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Looking into our circumstances...