Israel Shamir • January 24, 2017 • 129 Comments
The ascent of Donald Trump is more than a change of tenant at the White House at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. It is a momentous swing from Yin to Yang, from dark feminine to bright masculine paradigm, from Cybele to Christ. Tremendous resistance to the regime change proves its unique importance.
That's why the American colour revolution, the attempt to prevent the new president's reign, took the form of a women's march. Of a certain type of women wearing their genitals-like pink hats. Not of Saints Mary and Catherine, not of our wives and mothers, but of the wild throng of maenads, the Demented Ones who roamed the forests and, in their frenzy, tore men to pieces and devoured their flesh. They hate Christ and admire witches, and for them the murder of a babe in its mother's womb is not a necessity but their heart's desire. That's why they didn't allow pro-life women to join their rites.
If you prefer a more up-to-date comparison, this is a new Pussy Riot. Perhaps you remember there was a Russian group of that name. They were anti-Putin like the American lot is anti-Trump; they blasphemed like their American counterparts; they were guided and supported by Louise "Madonna" Ciccone, who starred in Washington, threatening to blow up the White House. The Russian group tried porno acts, without much avail; they tried politics – no success again; until they finally profaned the Moscow Cathedral. Then they were quickly sentenced to two years of gaol, and since then there has been peace between men and women in Russia. Sometimes a swift punishment is the best way to chill feverish minds and pussies.
Pussy Riot 2 were called Femen. You can read their story here. They do not exist anymore, as their leader said recently. And now, Pussy Riot 3, in Washington, another obscene attempt to use women and their bodies for political and religious anti-Christian purposes. Would you be surprised to learn that all three movements had been financed by Jewish hedge fund managers? Why do these men try so hard to manipulate women for gain?
Men love women; we are made that way. We love their beautiful bodies and their compassionate souls, their high spirit and their subtle mind. They are our lovers, friends, comrades. In all the history of art, there was perhaps one poet, Palladas of Alexandria, who said he abhorred women, and even that could be a case of sour grapes. Pity that in our post-Christian, or even anti-Christian society, a very old type of women has been reconstructed: that of the women who broke with Logos and united with the dark heathen spirit. Debased and debasing, they are eager to serve their Dark Lord of Wall Street.
Even more revolting are the men who sent these poor misled souls to riot in the cities of America, hoping to provoke police or public violence. They know it is difficult for real men to defend themselves against a women's attack, and they use that to the utmost.
A Russian Jewish writer, Dmitry Bykov, considered it a standard Jewish stratagem: they send a woman to provoke a man with nasty words and insults; if he responds, they attack him in defending the offended womanhood, he wrote in his amusing Living Souls. The Jewish masterminds of the virago revolt – George Soros and his fellow billionaire Tom Steyer, who pledged $100 million for regime change – utilised this time-honoured subterfuge.
The viragos were joined by LGBT, the evil Tetragrammaton, modern worshippers of Cybele. Cybele priests and worshippers castrated themselves in front of their goddess. This is the aim of the gender agenda: castration of the male. Now they have been defeated, as they were defeated centuries ago, and they are not taking it lying down.
So it is not a shift from Democrats to Republicans – it is a shift from Cybele to Christ. This esoteric side of the regime change has been clear to the protagonists. That's why Trump went to church hand-in-hand with his lady wife just before the oath, thus ceremonially restoring the normal order of things. That's why Trump, by his first blessed act, has removed the LGBT smut page off the White House site, restoring its whiteness.
Media, "a false witness who breathes out lies and sows discord among brothers" (the Proverbs are always the best for quotes!), reported "a million participants" in "Washington and elsewhere". This was very modest of them. I'd expect a billion demonstrating "elsewhere", or at least six million, a good and familiar number. There is no way to check the "elsewhere" numbers. Not only beauty, but the numbers are also in the eyes of the beholder; they saw just a few onlookers at the ceremony, but multitudes of the maenads from Seattle to Rhode Island marching to Washington DC to devour Trump as they devoured Orpheus.
This is the end of the Yin era of gender disorder. The era of kind old ladies assuming leadership on behalf of the unseen puppeteers. The era of unisex toilets instead of equality. The era of political correctness instead of correcting policies. The era of men being ashamed of their manhood and of women manipulated by hedge fund managers.
Even the best deeds of the departing regime were marked by gender disorder. Like Obama's pardon of Bradley Manning. I am really happy that this man will (hopefully) regain his freedom, after years in Gestapo cellars. Yes, Gestapo: Trump correctly compared the US secret services with those of the Third Reich. Manning had been kept naked and chained and humiliated and tortured. Not many prisoners of the German Gestapo suffered that much. At the end of his wits, he chose to give up his manhood. A tragic gesture. I wonder which of his tormentors gave him that advice.
He did not become a woman, for a man can't become a woman. Here I fully agree with Germaine Greer, the old feminist. Only God can make a woman. A man can only turn himself into a castrated transvestite. This fate was prepared for our sons by the domineering Yin. A sad fate for a man who gave us, gave to mankind, raw and precious data on the real election meddling in dozens of countries. Not the fake one by "Russian hackers", but the real one by the US State Department and secret services in the interest of NWO promoters. Now they have been defeated on their home ground by the American people, and Bradley Manning contributed hugely to that achievement.
But the media purred approvingly of "Chelsea Manning" and of "her" future as of a free "woman". What a silly choice of words! Well, let him be free and sort out his life.
The departing Yin era has brought feminism ad absurdum. So many recent movies catered to this demand. Their constant bleating of "four legs good, two legs bad" was used as a device to drown out any opposition, wrote George Orwell. In the Yin times, it was "vagina good, penis bad", but the bleating was equally persistent. All great discoveries were made by women, while men just appropriated them – that was the logic behind the new version of Ghostbusters and of The Hidden Figures. The last film perfected the idea by crediting not just any women, but black ones. God knows there are wonderful black women like Cynthia McKinney, who rebelled against the Jewish lobby in the occupied Capitol, but she was not the one they meant.
The history of arts has been re-written. In real life, women inspired (almost) every artist, but there were very few female artists. In the re-written history, Artemisia Gentileschi, an accomplished if second-rate woman painter of the 17th century, eclipsed her contemporaries in the number of studies. Vagina good, penis bad.
Homosexuality has been the most glorified gender disorder in the Yin era. Some of the male homosexuals were great artists, writers, and warriors; however, they had troubled and treacherous personalities. The best homosexual writer of the 20th century, Jean Genet, glorified cruelty, betrayal, and murder in his wonderful Our Lady of the Flowers. Art achievement is not proof of a reliable, good personality; more often, it is other way around.
We aren't allowed to say it anymore, but a few years ago it was received wisdom that homosexuals are treacherous and unreliable – definitely unsuitable for a public office of trust. This quality has endeared them with the Masters who need untrustworthy people, who would easily betray public trust, to fill important political positions.
A great Italian writer and war journalist, Curzio Malaparte, in his shocking book on the American occupation/liberation of Naples called The Skin ("what a man will do, what deeds of heroism and infamy he can accomplish, to save his skin"), noticed readiness of the homos to happily accept occupation and to please the invading army. For this sharp observation, he has been ostracised by much of the modern media; but indeed, native homosexuals are good for an occupying army. Israel takes care of Palestinian gays and even gives them a sort of asylum. Gay International (in the words of Joseph Massad) has been instrumental in a sort of colonisation of the Arab world. This could provide an additional explanation why the Masters supported and promoted this unnatural behaviour, as they treat their own countries as occupied territories.
This is not a call for any action against these people beyond pushing them back to their dens. Mankind lives with such disorders and even gets some benefits from their outrages; but never before has such a disorder has been "celebrated" as a new norm. There is nothing to celebrate. Go back to your closets, you poor tormented souls, together with BDSM practitioners, paedophiles, and other pizza consumers, and stay there.
If there is a topic that has generated a lot of dislike abroad for the US, it is pushing the same-sex agenda. The US is/was the only superpower, so few countries refused to comply with their violent and vehement push for the deviants' "rights"; but nobody liked it, not even Americans, judging by the election results. One of the secrets of Putin's popularity in Russia is his stubborn resistance to the previous American regime's demands to popularise sexual deviance. Private life in Russia is free and unhindered, but the deviants who want to celebrate their deviance in a public space in the presence of minors are stopped. In very tolerant France, President Hollande's insistence on forcing same-sex "marriage" in the face of huge popular opposition allowed him to achieve the lowest rating ever obtained by a ruling French leader. Hopefully, President Trump will not force us to witness unnatural acts in public.
It would be good to roll the viragos back, too. They infect their impressionable sisters by their wild misbehaviour, and turn men's lives into hell. Among good and great deeds of Putin, I'd list his suppression of Pussy Riot, the previous incarnation of the pink vaginas marching on the White House.
Wherever you witness a battle against Logos, against Christ, and against nature, you'd expect to meet some Jews. Indeed, Jewish hedge fund managers paid for the pussy riots while Jewish-owned media provided them with free and plentiful publicity. So where do the Jews stand in relation to Trump?
Let's face it, the Jews do not like Trump (always excepting some individuals, for free will can beat ethnic affiliation any time). There are Zionist Jews, including Prime Minister Netanyahu, who think Trump can be good for the Jews. But then, there were Zionist Jews who thought Hitler would be good for the Jews. They tried, and succeeded, in running a profitable business with Nazi Germany between 1933 and 1941. In the face of Jewish-American establishment displeasure, they traded for millions of dollars with the Nazi enemy and profited hugely, as Germany experienced difficulties in its foreign trade because of the Jewish boycott. Hitler hoped this trade with the Zionists would improve his relations with the important American Jewish community, but in vain.
So it is an old Jewish stratagem: the main body of Jews fights an enemy, while a secondary hedging movement has a profitable relation with the enemy. Now the main forces of Jews fight Trump and everything he stands for. The Jews in the Congress and Senate, Jews in the mass media from Hollywood to the NY Times, are against Trump. But the hedging secondary Zionist branch supports Trump, as they hope he will give them a lot.
Now Israelis plan to annex some parts of the West Bank and they hope to bring the US embassy to Jerusalem. The Zionist Jews are in a rush because they are afraid Trump will understand, sooner or later, that he gets very little from the Zionists in return. Zionists can't influence the main Jewish body to any large extent. Google searching for "Trump antisemite" produces half a million hits; many of them are very recent. Let's just mention an opinion piece by Bernard-Henri Levy in the NY Times explaining that Trump is a swineherd who wants to destroy the Jews through his ostensibly kind acts. In short, extreme Zionists – or Ultra-Orthodox Jews – can't deliver goods Trump wants. So unless he wants to provide for them just for the pleasure of being nice to some Jews, this relationship is not likely to last long, and may end in sorrow.
For the Jews support financial institutions from the Federal Reserve to banks to hedge funds; they profit from open borders, they are for immigration, and they are usually against popular leaders and politicians. By every logical reason, they will be against Trump – while the Israelis will try to milk Trump as much and as fast as they can.
However, none of it – neither Jews nor viragos and deviants – presents a deadly threat. This is an opposition and a bother one can live with. The victory of the Yang can't and won't be total. Yin and Yang co-exist forever; it is just a question of proportion. President Trump should not even wish for total victory and elimination of Yin elements. It will suffice to push them into their proper subservient place, out of the centre of cultural and economic life. Subservience of the Yang is abnormal, but Yin should keep a modest place. Hopefully, this will be achieved.
Israel Shamir can be reached at adam@israelshamir.net
This article was first published at The Unz Review.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.