Centrist Democrats break with liberals to join GOP on climate change 'down payment' plan
Get ready with the liquid cash fire hoses. News update for 9 March 2020: Deepening Rout in U.S. Stock Futures Triggers Limit Down Rules
The oligarchical financial elite that have made a career of stealing from the federal government now need a new direction to further monopolize and consolidate their financial position. This means implementation of climate change explaining why the republican Dan Crenshaw wants immediate action. Well of course he does, both republicans and democrats work for these same financial oligarchs. So not only a "climate crisis," but also a "coronavirus crisis" (the Church of Coronavirus). Here's an interesting line of inquiry: How much in digital cryptocurrency assets does Dan Crenshaw hold or what is his knowledge of cryptocurrencies? Here is an example of central financial control to monopolize their position:
Global sustainable investments rise 34% to $30.7 trillion
Jamie Dimon was so busy hard at work consolidating the financial oligarchy control and monopoly for a bankrupt JP Morgan that he ended up in the hospital to have emergency heart surgery. So we're told. The world's most corrupt bank (silver price manipulation) JP Morgan's CEO Jamie Dimon definitely "believes in climate change." The bankers mantra: "climate change."
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon had emergency heart surgery
Climate change is 'a serious issue,' JP Morgan Chase CEO says
Before we get to the Dan Crenshaw call for immediate action news on the "climate crisis" to assist his oligarchic banking financial handlers consolidate their monopoly, here is Cher asking if you "believe." Do you believe? The Republican Mitch McConnell believes. What does he believe? McConnell believes the financial oligarchy are consolidating and monopolizing their control. McConnell's net worth is estimated at $22.5 million spending his entire career in "government" since 1974. The same government that was handed over to private financial interests McConnell works for. He must have listened to Cher sing "Do You Believe In Life After Climate Change?" Does Cher "believe in life after love" or does she believe in climate change?
Do you believe in financial life after climate change?
What do the republicans Mitch O'Connell and Den Crenshaw believe in? Both believe in the FASAB Statement 56: Understanding New Government Financial Accounting Loopholes that discards the Constitution to keep secret books on finances. If you were to pull McConnell and Crenshaw aside and find out somehow their real private personal views on "climate change," be assured you would hear something completely different than their public statements.
FASAB Statement 56: Understanding New Government Financial Accounting Loopholes
Mitch McConnell's partisan circus serves Trump and shafts everyone else
________
Source: Big League Politics
Dan Crenshaw Calls for Immediate Republican Action at the Federal Level to Stop Climate Change
This guy is supposed to be a conservative?
March 6, 2020 | By Shane Trejo
Rep. Dan "McCain 2.0" Crenshaw (R-TX) came out with an op/ed this week in National Review arguing that conservatives need to embrace the reality of climate change and propose a government solution to the supposed problem.
"With ever-more-extreme "solutions" such as the Green New Deal being proposed, conservatives have quickly taken the bait, falling into the tired political trap set by leftists. But I believe we no longer have to do this. We can fight back against the alarmism with tangible solutions based on reason, science, and the free market," he wrote.
Crenshaw bragged in the op/ed that he is working with House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) on a globalist plan to defeat climate change.
"After all, climate change is a global issue, and with global energy demand expected to increase by 25 percent over the next 20 years, there is a distinct need for the U.S. to export cleaner energy sources to the developing world, as well as to the biggest CO2 emitters, such as China and India," he wrote.
Crenshaw's plan is called the New Energy Frontier, and he wants the government to pick winners and losers in the marketplace in order to support natural-gas technology that he claims is carbon neutral. He wants more bureaucracy to be put in place in order to facilitate his big government solution.
"I also propose creating a new “Carbon Utilization Energy Innovation Hub," which will exist within DOE for the sole purpose of exploring how we can make carbon dioxide useful," he wrote.
He claims that if the Republicans do not support a big government solution to climate change, the Democrats will come up with an even bigger government solution for the problem.
"Conservatives can either tackle the issue of carbon emissions sensibly by proposing workable solutions, or run the risk of allowing the Democrats to do it for us — with policies that would offer marginal environmental benefits at a devastating cost to the economy," he wrote.
He finished his op/ed with a quote from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and essentially confirmed that he is taking her advice.
He concluded: "As Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.), my colleague, said of this dichotomy, "If you don't like the Green New Deal, then come up with your own ambitious, on-scale proposal to address the global climate crisis. Until then, we're in charge."
"We don't want them in charge. It's time to start promoting conservative solutions. The New Energy Frontier is exactly that," Crenshaw wrote.
Crenshaw, through his support of endless wars, red flag laws and now federal climate change policy, has demonstrated time and again that he is not an authentic conservative.
Please go to Big League Politics to read the entire article.
________
Source: National Justice
Op-Ed: Either We Destroy the Republican Party or It Will Destroy Us
By Eric Striker | March 7, 2020
There's no question that American bastions of power - business, courts, intelligence services, media, ivy league universities - are firmly in the grip of Jewish oligarchs and the 10-15% of upper middle class professionals that form their second estate.
Conservatives, with the exception of a few Israel-hawks and economic libertarians, are absent in this demographic. What they all have in common is seething animosity towards the traditional family, nation-states, white people, working people and Western civilization, which in the eyes of top billionaires are barriers to profits and potential means of resistance to their master plan, and for the lower tier of the new aristocracy, stains of retrograde bigotry and intolerance that must be shattered to usher in the era of the new cosmopolitan overman.
Michael Lind calls these people the "liberaltarians," upper class people who adhere to extreme, activist forms of social liberalism combined with rapacious capitalism. The convergence is stark. "Socialist" left academics at the Jacobin and their libertarian right equivalents at the Cato Institute have the exact same views and rationalizations on questions of sexuality, family values, religion, immigration, drugs, globalism, crime and race. Their consensus is highly unpopular even across racial lines in America and would never survive democratic scrutiny, but ordinary people are not allowed to participate in academia, non-profit foundations or media. All we have is a few elective branches of the state.
Which is why every two and four years, America's silenced majority expresses what they think is a veto of the abyss these unelected forces are foisting us into, usually in the form of delivering Congress and/or the Executive office to the Republican Party. Republicans have won 8 out of the last 13 presidential races since 1968.
During Newt Gingrich's 1994 "Revolution," Republicans drew up a "Contract with America" that promised a radical overhaul in Washington to combat corruption, as well as increase popular participation and transparency in government affairs in the interest of creating a counter-balance to elitism. This was paired with a plan to crack down on out-of-control black crime and fight abuses of "Great Society" programs, a form of "socialism" that is uniquely American in that white working people pay almost as much in taxes as Europeans, but are often excluded from reaping the benefits of social programs due to the absurdly low means threshold for participating.
The end result was that the GOP was able to solidify a national white voting base, including for the first time ever the South, making a once competitive congressional kingmaker solidly red and giving the GOP total control of Congress for the first time since 1954.
What did the Republicans do with their mandate in '94? There were one or two modest achievements, but they mostly spent two years inviting libertarian think-tanks and corporate lobbies to draw up predictable legislation: pollute the environment, cut Medicare, defund schools and give Wall Street and multi-nationals the savings through tax-cuts untethered to productive investment. The people responded: Bill Clinton, a neo-liberal himself, batted away some of their shittier proposals and was re-elected in 1996. The GOP's congressional presence was crushed in 1998.
[Want an ugly look at Bill Clinton's neo-liberal policies? Have a look at what Bill Clinton allowed to happen in Arkansas: The Bastards Who Murdered My Dad and 7000 Other Canadians!]
The Republicans have staged many dramatic comebacks since then, promising in dog whistles, or in Trump's case, explicit terms, to fight the ever more virulent racial attacks on whites by the Democratic party. Every time voters forgive or forget their last term, they are given the power to do something about it, and like clockwork you get the exact same legislative agenda they've had for 40 years.
Even if we were to give the GOP the benefit of the doubt and pretend they are not just a corrupt mouthpiece for billionaires and Zionists, its core ideology makes it useless and dangerous.
According to the institutional philosophy of the Republican Party, state power is in and of itself immoral. GOP deregulation sprees transfer more power away from the government, where we have some degree of say, and into the hands of private plutocratic interests who can't be voted out but have grown to exert more and more power over our every day lives. Homosexuality, feminism, globalization, immigration and other elite impositions rapidly advance under Trump just like they did under Reagan. The minoritarian impulse to terrorize the majority and force it to assimilate to its eccentricities has always existed - just ask the Jews - what has changed in the neoliberal era is the waning of state power and its reluctance to satisfy the will of the people when other nodes of social, economic and cultural power are captured by anti-social forces and unilaterally decide that normal people no longer have a place in America.
This obviously upsets the people, which then leads to "anarcho-tyranny," an ironic combination of social disintegration protected by ideologically selective, heavily abusive intelligence services and police - knights in the service of oligarchy.
The lack of a will to govern Republicans elected to government prize guarantees that their voters lose every cultural, social and economic war in the short-term, and are governed by people who hate them in the long-term. All nine Supreme Court Justices are graduates of two "private" ivy leagues: Harvard, a school that is only 10% white male Gentile (with homosexuals overrepresented in this segment) and forces students to take lessons on hating white people, or Yale, which is identical in all regards. Whether "conservative" or "liberal," what kind of ideological principles can the public expect present and future judges to have when elite-to-power pipelines teach them to despise the values, traditions and very existence of the people they rule? The GOP's worldview is a fraud to circumvent popular approval, perpetuated in the interest of replacing the white majority which would never vote for its own dispossession otherwise.
It is the hallmark of madness for America's majority to continue expecting a party that does not believe in governing to ever do anything to defend its desperate voters, solidified as a bloc behind them out of fear that the other party might be worse. Trump was elected to stop immigration and deport the illegals, but in the two years the president and the GOP ran the entire government, it was Gingrich and Reagan all over again.
Please go to National Justice to read the entire article.
________
Ed.'s note: Always expect cutting edge "climate change" reporting from the BBC. Lord David Puttman asks "what further price will further generations pay" if nothing is done to slow down the "climate change crisis." What Puttman actually means is further generations will be paying debt they didn't incur without even being born yet.
Climate change: What price will future generations pay?
Some more fun ancillary sh*t to read:
Jeff Bezos, here's how to give away $10 billion to stop climate change
A-Z of climate anxiety: how to avoid meltdown
We find your "lack of faith in climate change" disturbing...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.