Wednesday, August 17, 2016

Jewish Power Is Now Out In the Open - Zio-Directed The Daily Beast - Michael Weiss and His Syrian "Rebel" Fanboys - Controlling the Discourse - Revelation of the Method: Reverse This Power or it Will be Absolute - The Population Has Been Demoralized - Will There be a Revolution in the Streets or Crickets Chirping - The Revolutionary Spirit of Jews - The Daily Traditionalist: The Ancient Alliance of Islam and Jewry - Learn Why Jews Despise Russia - Soros Attacks Putin's Party

Source: The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection

Michael Weiss and the Iran-U.S. Hardline Nexus That Led Iranian-American to Evin Prison

How Daily Beast Editor, Michael Weiss Helped Send Iranian-American to Torture Chambers of Evin Prison 

by Richard Silverstein

August 15, 2016

Weiss affects a long-haired, unshaven Bohemian look

It's a long way from the campus of Dartmouth College in New Hampshire's Great North Woods in 2003 to Tehran's Evin Prison in 2016. But the path between them led to a fateful intersection of the lives of Michael D. Weiss (the Dartmouth student) and Siamak Namazi (a jailed Iranian-American). It was Weiss who helped put him there. Weiss, age 36, has been an itinerant freelance journalist and military interventionist gun-for-hire, plying his trade from Washington DC, to London, to the outlying lands of former Russian empire, to the ruins of Syria.

With his role as CNN commentator and senior editor at the Daily Beast, he is a leading light among a new young generation of neoconservative intellectuals. These positions offer him the opportunity to shape American political discourse in much the same way Bill Kristol's Project for the New American Century, shaped U.S. militarist-interventionist foreign policy for a decade or more after its famous 1998 letter to Bill Clinton.

A disciple of Christopher Hitchens, Weiss shares the late British intellectual's penchant for intellectual combat and a gift for the deft, savage phrase. Like him, Weiss fancies nostalgic ties to some radical left tradition. Also like Hitchens, he has the knack for popularizing neoconservative ideas in media-friendly sound bytes. Unlike Hitchens, Weiss has proven to be exceedingly opaque in terms of some of the political and financial alliances he's made.

Michael D. Weiss graduated in 2003 with a BA in History from Dartmouth College. In 2006, he signed the Euston Manifesto, a political broadside by liberal intellectuals embracing a new robust interventionist politics. It was written largely by the UK philosopher, Norman Geras. Here is how Weiss described the Band of [ex-radical] Brothers who devised it:

Amidst this moral and ideological muddle, a group of graying British Marxists and ex-Communists huddled together in a London pub in May of 2005 and began crafting a manifesto for the 21st century left. Enough was enough.

A 2007 profile in Geras', Normblog, notes some of Weiss' odd agglomeration of interests and predilections. He notes one of his earliest "successes" as a blogger was calling for a protest in "support of Denmark" in the midst of the Jyllands Posten-Mohammed cartoon controversy.

The blog he most admires is Harry's Place, a notorious haven for refugees from various leftist movements who've "seen the light" and turned to the right. Among their chief occupations is bashing figures on the left, especially those who criticize Israel or endorse Palestinian rights.

Weiss lists as his special heroes Karl Marx, Irving Howe (a bit of a clash there between the founder of Communism and an ardent anti-Communist), and George Orwell. Among the surprising things this future neocon endorses is "socialized healthcare."

After Dartmouth, he enrolled at the New School as a student disciple of one of his intellectual heroes, Christopher Hitchens. There he learned the art of stabbing his political enemies with an acid-tipped pen. It's no coincidence that the title of his blog, defunct since 2010, was Snarksmith.

Later, he moved to Bill Kristol's shop at the Weekly Standard. Still later, he became an editor at the online Jewish publication, Jewcy, where I first encountered him.[1]

Around 2008, Weiss moved from New York to London where he became the founding director of Just Journalism, a pro-Israel advocacy group tasked with policing the media for "anti-Israel bias." It based its model on the U.S. based CAMERA, which monitors U.S. mainstream media, acting as a form of media thought-police regarding the Israeli-Arab conflict.

Just Journalism closed its doors in 2011 due to lack of funds. But before it died, Weiss had taken on a second post with the Henry Jackson Society (HJS) in 2010. From its founding in 2005 till 2009, HJS was a centrist foreign policy think-tank seeking to forge a middle-ground between the "conservative-realist right and the anti-imperialist left." It was named for the staunchly anti-Communist U.S. Senator Henry Jackson, whose heyday was in the 1970s. Jackson was one of the last Cold War warriors, who'd led the drive on behalf of Soviet Jewry, thus making himself a close ally of Israel and the U.S.-based Israel lobby.

It hosted a variety of academics with differing geographic specialities and ideological orientations who used HJS as a springboard for debate in their various fields. UK academic, Markus Attila Hoare, was one of the co-founders and served as HJS' Balkan specialist.

Later when he came aboard, Weiss was named HJS director of research (one of a shifting series of job titles over time). As such, he controlled the publication of HJS research scholars. One day, Hoare found he was no longer permitted to publish on the group's website. Weiss declared that under the new regime only he had the right to determine what was published.

Hoare portrayed the 2011 merger of Just Journalism and another Tory think-tank, the Center for Social Cohesion, as a "putsch." He left HJS sometime after his altercation with Weiss and wrote a long appraisal–at times sad, at times bitter–of the demise of the dream he and his colleagues once shared.

The "new" HJS was a muscular proponent of UK solidarity with Israel. It became a staunch opponent of anything that smacked of hostility to Israel, whether it be Palestinians or left-wing politicians, or European NGOs.

Another Weiss HJS job title was director of the Russia Studies Center (without speaking Russian or ever having lived there). In 2011, Weiss also began publishing a blog at the Daily Telegraph, (a publication sometimes derisively referred to as "Torygraph").

Later, a former HJS insider reported to me, Weiss had a falling out as well with two of his former allies at HJS. Things became so acrimonious he had to hire a lawyer and later sign a non-disparagement agreement so as not to air any dirty linen in public.

The most comprehensive account of HJS' rise and fall is Spinwatch's, The Henry Jackson Society and the degeneration of British neoconservatism: liberal interventionism, Islamophobia and the 'war on terror'.

Syria's Civil War and Weiss' New-Found Calling as Syria Interventionist

Weiss with Syrian rebel fanboys

In 2011, Syrian civil unrest commenced and turned gradually into a regional proxy war. As Syrian rebels began their fight to topple Bashar al-Assad; and Russia and Iran rallied to support the Syrian dictator, Weiss saw a new opportunity to advance his interventionist agenda. He became one of the leading neocon intellectuals advocating muscular U.S. intervention on the side of the Syrian rebels. He advocated those views in publications of the foreign policy elite like Foreign Policy, think tanks like the Carnegie Council for International Affairs, and TV shows too innumerable to mention.

He is a producer's dream. Like his mentor Hitchens, he is glib and articulate. He explains complicated, confusing issues like ISIS in a media-savvy package. His slashing wit (again, think a dumbed-down version of Hitchens add a note of drama and conspiratorial mystery as well) piques the interest of his audience. Few producers will do enough due diligence to research articles like this one exposing Weiss' foibles, or damning profiles by James Carden in The Nation or Mark Ames in Pando.

In one of the more memorable portrayals of Weiss' career, Carden wrote to me:

Weiss has become a regular contributor to CNN

…Given his past association with the Henry Jackson Society, in his work as an errand-boy for Christopher Hitchens and the Khodorkovsky family, and as a high profile editor/contributor at the Daily Beast and CNN, Weiss has established himself as the leading neocon propagandist of his generation.

The Elizabeth O'Bagy Scandal

In 2013, Weiss teamed up with Elizabeth O'Bagy to write an article in The Atlantic which advocated regime change in Syria. Separately, she wrote a similar piece for the Wall Street Journal. What the WSJ didn't reveal was that O'Bagy was a paid consultant for an NGO working to provide military weapons to the Syrian rebels and overthrow Assad, the Syrian Emergency Task Force (SETF). On the strength of her work, she was invited to testify before Congress. But she had a wee-small problem. She'd embellished her academic record, which led to being fired by the NGO and staining all those who'd championed her, including Weiss. WSJ's failure to note her affiliation with SETF also posed a clear conflict of interest.

More recently, Weiss traveled to Turkey to interview a supposed escapee from the ISIS gulag. His three-part Daily Beast profile purported to offer a behind the scenes look into life as an ISIS fighter. He gave his informant a pseudonym, ostensibly to protect him from reprisals by his former comrades. The stories he was told contained just enough detail to allow readers to believe in the authenticity of the narrative. But not enough to allow researchers to definitively corroborate the tale he told.

Weiss, Next Generation of the Neocon Intellectual Elite

Weiss seeks to mold a vision that is as ambitious as the one molded by his mentors, Hitchens and Bill Kristol.

It was Kristol who co-founded PNAC for the New American Century with the goal of reshaping the Middle East in the image of the west. The Weekly Standard publisher pinned his hopes on the Bush administration and the Iraq War as the means to make an indelible mark on U.S. foreign policy in the Mideast. Unfortunately, the project didn't turn out as expected. The baby, in an ironic echo of Condoleezza Rice’s infamous saying about the "birthpangs of a new Middle East," died aborning.

Not to be outdone, Weiss has adapted the old anti-Communism of Scoop Jackson, tossed in a touch of Bill Kristol-PNAC's projection of U.S. military might to reshape broad swaths of the Middle East, along with a heaping measure of Khodorkovsky's dream of regime change in Russia. To this, he's added a strong dose of anti-jihadism. It makes for a supremely ambitious, geopolitically sweeping, and exceedingly dangerous stew.

Like Kristol, Weiss too dreams of a war he can make his own. There is a fertile field of possibilities: Syria, Ukraine, the Baltic States, even Iran (though a more remote possibility currently after the nuclear deal). He failed to provoke war in Syria when Pres. Obama rejected a military adventure there. Nor has he succeeded in provoking NATO intervention in Ukraine. But there is still time…and hope.

Weiss Teams Up with Russian Oligarch, Mikhail Khodorkovsky

Siamak Namazi

He and Mikhail Khodorkovsky teamed up because the latter seeks to topple the Putin regime. One way to inch closer to the prospect is to inject anti-Putin propaganda into the world media. Hence, Weiss’ Weiss’ gig as editor of The Interpreter. Its mission is:

…The modest goal of translating articles from the Russian press, the better to lower the language barrier that separates journalists, analysts, policymakers, diplomats and interested laymen in the English-speaking world from events taking place inside the Russian Federation.

Oh the irony of a journalist who doesn't speak the language, yet edits a journal designed to translate the Russian language and nation to a western audience!

Recently, Khodorkovsky supposedly passed the baton to Radio Free Liberty, which is the new sponsor of the online magazine. From information I have heard, RFE will essentially share content with The Interpreter, with no funding involved. With leaves open the question of where funding for the venture originates.

Given that Weiss regularly testifies before Congressional committees on the danger posed by Putin and ISIS, it's clear he has patrons within the government, along with patrons within the think tank community. Other journalists have speculated to me that the U.S. may be reviving covert Cold War funding mechanisms to finance projects like Weiss’. But you don't have to be as conspiratorial as all that to believe that a GOP Congressmember with anti-Muslim, anti-Putin sympathies would be only too happy to slip an appropriation into a bill as a favor to Khodorkovsky or any of a number of Weiss' neocon patrons.

Weiss' New Friends at the Legatum Institute

Among them are Jeffrey Gedmin and Anne Applebaum of the Legatum Institute, a neocon think tank founded ostensibly to promote freedom and democracy through capitalism. Legatum's targets are places like Russia and former Soviet satellites like Ukraine, the Baltic states and Poland, perceived to be under threat from Putinist hegemony. Gedmin is a former CEO of Radio Free Liberty and a signatory of the Project for a New American Century, which led to our disastrous war in Iraq. Applebaum is an award-winning writer who has documented the crimes of the Soviet gulag.

Legatum has financed a number of Weiss anti-Putin projects which received widespread media coverage and resulted in Congressional testimony, including a report with the suitably racy title, The Menace of Unreality: How the Kremlin Weaponizes Information, Culture and Money.

The term "weaponization" in the Russian context was first coined by NYU Russian studies scholar Mark Galeotti, who has since expressed reservations about the sweeping manner in which anti-Putin ideologues (like Weiss) use it. Weiss has glommed onto the phrase himself and used it to argue that the west too must weaponize information as Putin has. Among the policies he envisions in the western fight against Putin is censorship regimes against dissident voices which advance a pro-Russian agenda.

Weiss also approvingly quoted NATO commander Philip Breedlove who speaks of Putin's "weaponization of refugees." In the latter case, most scholars see absolutely no evidence that the Assad regime has recruited sleeper agents to attack the west or anything of the sort. This is precisely the sort of shoddy analysis and reportage of which Weiss is often and manifestly guilty.

Mark Ames reports that Legatum is financed by an obscure New Zealand vulture capitalist (as Ames calls him), Christopher Chandler, who invested millions in distressed Russian debt and failing companies, which he subsequently turned into billions. In other words, he is the western equivalent of Khodorkovsky. That makes for a perfect fit for Weiss.

His relationship with oligarchs offers mutual benefit to both: Weiss gains financing, media access and social approval; while the billionaires exploit his dashing exploits in combat zones and intellectual panache to advance their own political and financial interests.

In the Middle Ages, European rulers had court Jews who financed their wars and building projects. But these modern oligarchs don’t need money. They need popularizers who can package and transform political jihad into a simple, appealing mantra. Weiss performs this role admirably.

Weiss and the Anti-Putin Rumor Mill

Applebaum’s husband, Radek Sikorski, is a former Polish foreign minister who invented a conversation between Vladimir Putin and Polish President Donald Tusk, in which the former suggested that both countries carve up Ukraine.

Weiss dutifully featured this as a prominent scoop on Twitter.

Till Sikorski tried to walk the entire story back, later even apologizing for his "memory failing him:"

Sikorski was confronted at a press conference by Polish journalists, demanding clarifications regarding his remarks. However, the ex-foreign minister was vague about whether or not he made the remarks published by Politico. Before long Sikorski admitted that he never personally heard of Putin offering to divide Ukraine, then refused to go into more details or answer additional questions from the media.

Weiss' Take-No-Prisoners Approach to Adversaries

Weiss is not above sabotaging the careers of his adversaries. Beware if you cross him in one of his spheres of interest. John Rosenthal is a Europe-based author, who wrote a book about the influence of Al Qaeda in Libya after Qaddafi's fall. Until 2012, he wrote regularly for The National Review (NR). His last piece was a report largely translated from Germany's leading daily newspaper, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, which claimed that a massacre in a village called Houla had not been perpetrated by the Assad regime as had been reported previously. Rather, Sunni rebels had orchestrated the attack and the victims were largely Shia and Alawite.

Since the massacre, as first reported, had generated enormous outrage against the Assad regime (a Weiss bete noire), he and a group of like-minded anti-jihadi analysts took up the cause against Rosenthal. Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi and Philip Smyth wrote a scathing rebuttal of Rosenthal’s piece for NR.

Smyth, who is an adjunct fellow at Aipac's think-tank, the Washington Institute for Near East Peace, is quoted liberally and approvingly in many Weiss articles in Politico, the Daily Beast and Foreign Policy (among others). Tamimi however, seems to have later fallen afoul of Weiss when the former attacked him in a 2014 story he published at his website. Weiss and allies like Armin Rosen at Business Insider, went on the counter-attack and accused Tamimi of being overly chummy with his ISIS sources. They clearly sought to derail his career (Rosen opined that it had "come apart" and predicted its imminent demise in his article).

The Weiss-Rosen attacks don't seem to have had their desired impact, as Tamimi continues to be cited and published in the mainstream media. Someone Rosen quotes as criticizing Tamimi, Daveed Gartenstein Ross, even later co-authored an article with him at Foreign Affairs.

Returning to Rosenthal: after the Tamimi-Smyth attack piece was published, Weiss joined in. He even boasted on Twitter that NR had "barred" Rosenthal from the pages of the publication.

Rosenthal attempted repeatedly and unsuccessfully to ascertain his status at the publication. His pitches began to be rejected until editors stopped responding at all.

Rosenthal believes that Weiss intervened with NR editors and advocated that they stop publishing his work. Even if he did not, Rosenthal believes that Weiss was told directly by NR staff that Rosenthal would be barred. Weiss' efforts to sabotage Rosenthal's publishing career seem to have faltered. The latter now publishes regularly at Al Monitor, the Weekly Standard, the Wall Street Journal Europe, and elsewhere.

Weiss and his crony circle played a similar role in attempting to suppress publication of this profile. It was originally commissioned for publication by Alternet. But a member of Weiss' circle contacted former Alternet staff, who relayed a message to the publisher that it would be a mistake to publish the piece. The publisher killed it.

One Middle East analyst familiar with Weiss' work called him a "hack," Weiss is clearly a journalist-pugilist with a long memory who nurtures grudges.

Weiss Joins Daily Beast and Recruits Muslim "Reformers" as Contributors

The Daily Beast's (DB) editor, John Avlon, hired Weiss as senior editor, in June 2015. Avlon is a former columnist for the neocon New York Sun and former chief speechwriter for Rudy Giuliani. In his new role, Weiss has recruited some of his pals to contribute to DB. They include Maajid Nawaz, a former Liberal Democratic MP candidate who made a reputation as a Muslim reformer till he was videotaped getting a lap dance at a UK sex club. He called his escapade "sex-positive feminism." He fancies himself a "former Muslim radical" who's seen the error of his ways. Now he wants to tell the non-Muslim world how to attack Islamism and defeat it.

He founded the "counter-extremism" NGO, the Quilliam Foundation with a $1-million grant from the right-wing Christian, Templeton Foundation. The British government awarded nearly $4-million to Quilliam for the intellectual component of its "war on terror" amid the country's Muslim community.

After abandoning his first Muslim wife, Nawaz remarried the American artist and writer, Rachel Maggart. He'd been introduced to her by another former Muslim turned neocon, Ayan Hirsi Ali. Before the wedding he posted this incredibly prurient and juvenile tweet featuring a his wife in a model-like sexy pose: ""Don't ya wish your wifey. was. hot. like. mine? …. Don't ya? … Don't ya?"

In the past few years, Nawaz has made an "American pivot," where the money seems to be good: he's received grants from the right-wing Bradley Foundation and nearly $1-million from Gen Next, a philanthropic network affiliated with the Koch brothers. Here in American, Weiss has now become one of his greatest boosters and offered him a perch at Daily Beast (DB)

Weiss, the Daily Beast and the Road to Evin

Another puzzling, problematic author Weiss brought to the magazine was "Alex Shirazi" (a pseudonym). Until he published his first piece in July 2015 (a month after Weiss took on his new editorial role) under a joint byline with Weiss, there is no online record that "Shirazi" ever existed. When queried by Huffington Post, DB conceded that the name was a pseudonym and added this to the author bio accompanying the piece with this explanation.

UPDATE 12/14/15: Alex Shirazi is a pseudonym for a well-known Iranian dissident who requested that The Daily Beast keep his identity concealed for fear of what might happen to his family in Iran in retaliation for this article. We regret not noting this earlier.

The editor of a national newspaper based in New York offered me an appraisal of this practice after hearing about this case: "there is no journalistic justification, on first glance, for a pseudonym. It appears to break faith with readers and public accountability vis a vis the writer."

In preparation for his second DB article, "Shirazi" first approached Iranian-American oil executive Siamak Namazi, while the latter was visiting Iran in June 2015. At that time, the "journalist" did not reveal his real identity to his subject. He e-mailed a list of questions he wished Namazi to answer about the supposed financial benefits the Iranian regime offered his family.

The nature of the questions alarmed Namazi and members of his family Shirazi also contacted. As a result, they contacted Shirazi's editor, Weiss, requesting that he review the questions himself, suggesting that they were unfair and even libelous. Weiss declined to intervene, so Namazi escalated his concerns to managing editor, John Avlon. He warned the Daily Beast executive that such an article was likely to harm both him and his family. All this was to no avail.

Siamak Namazi pictured with his father, Baquer. Both are now imprisoned in Iran. Credit: Reuters.

Within a week of receiving Shirazi's inquiry, Namazi was stopped at the airport by Iranian security officials and refused permission to leave the country. Several months later, in September, DB published Shirazi's profile, and within a month Namazi was in the notorious Evin Prison. This raises the strong probability that Iranian hardliners were monitoring either Shirazi or Namazi's e-mail accounts, and that the questions and implicit accusations raised in the messages were exploited by Iranian intelligence officers to implicate Namazi.

Who is Siamak Namazi? His good friend, Reza Marashi, wrote this appreciation of him in Huffington Post:

He helped run a world-renowned consulting firm – staffed predominantly with Iranian-born citizens – that facilitated badly-needed foreign investment from blue-chip multinational corporations.

Neither money nor power was ever a driving force behind Siamak's work. It was the indigenous development of his motherland that motivated him. Siamak wanted Iran to live up to its vast potential, and he was at the forefront of teaching international best practices and standards in business and management to scores of young Iranians. The pride on his face was always evident when his employees would move on to successful careers across a variety of fields in Iran.

…As U.S. sanctions were causing medical supply shortages in Iran, he independently researched and published what became the authoritative literature on the subject. I was in the audience when he presented his findings in Washington DC. As Siamak began to describe the disastrous impact of sanctions on innocent Iranians, he choked up, paused for a moment, composed himself, and then proceeded to finish his presentation. That's how much he loves the country that is currently keeping him in prison.

It might surprise Siamak's captors to know that he actively discouraged me from getting involved in politics. After sparring over the pros and cons of such a career, I matter-of-factly told him that I truly believe in making the world a better place. He leaned back in his chair, smirked, and told me: There are plenty of ways to make the world a better place without making yourself a target in Washington and Tehran. Hardly the advice of a man who was "collaborating with enemy states" and "heading a political, economic, and cultural mafia gang."

It's ironic that DB claims it agreed to use a pseudonym for "Shirazi" in order to protect his family in Iran considering that Weiss' smear of Namazi landed both the latter and his 80 year-old father behind bars.

Rather than protecting family members from harm, the use of a pseudonym had the effect of shielding the author from proper scrutiny as to his motives, his associations, and any conflicts of interest he might have.

The Namazi family and its supporters have established a website, Free Siamak and Baquer Namazi, which offers updates on their case and the campaign to free them.

That second DB article was entitled, The Shady Family Behind America's Iran Lobby. Published in September 2015, it was a lurid "expose" filled with innuendo and unsupported allegations regarding the cozy commercial relationships an Iranian family enjoyed with the clerical regime. The article placed special emphasis on Siamak, the son of the patriarch of the family, Baquer Namazi.

To reinforce the ominousness of the charges against Namazi, the graphic art accompanying the DB article consisted of a series of shady-looking Arab militants sporting beards, long hair, a turban and sunglasses. The image is a cross between an Arab playboy and an ISIS fighter. No one in Iran dresses this way. The graphic is little more than an Iranophobic pastiche. Clearly, rather than an expose or serious profile, this was meant as a hit-piece.

The Ongoing Neocon Attack on NIAC

The main contention implicit in the headline was itself wrong on several counts. Neither Siamak nor his family are "behind" the so-called "Iran Lobby." Nor is the Iranian-American NGO attacked in the article, the National Iranian-American Council (NIAC) "America's Iran Lobby."

A common smear tactic of DC Beltway neoconservatives and the Iranian cult group, Mujahadeen e Khalq (MEK) has been to label NIAC a stooge of the Iranian regime. In reality, NIAC is a completely independent, nonpartisan organization.

Ironically, Aipac, a group heartily supported by those like Eli Lake, Kenneth Timmerman and Weiss who’ve attacked NIAC, is far more of a slavish booster of the Israeli regime than NIAC is of the Iranian regime.

Further, "Shirazi" recycled another claim first advanced by Eli Lake in a 2009 article in the Washington Times, in which he falsely claimed Namazi played a key role in founding NIAC. Namazi soundly rejected this claim in a letter to the editor he wrote at the time. He was never affiliated in any way with NIAC other than paying a single annual membership fee in 2005. All it would’ve taken for “Shirazi” to ascertain this fact was a phone call to NIAC, which he never made.

Nikahang Kowsar="Alex Shirazi"

Among Iranian-Americans, there has been a great deal of speculation about "Shirazi's" real identity. A number of them have noted that shortly before his DB article was published a very similar post appeared in a Farsi-language blog written by a former Iranian journalist and activist, Nikahang Kowsar.

Kowsar began his career in the heyday of the liberal reforms of the Khatami era in the early 2000s. He became a journalist and one of Iran's most well-known political cartoonists. His most famous cartoon pictured a hardline cleric as a crocodile strangling a journalist with his tail, which led to his arrest and imprisonment. On his release, he went into exile and fled to Canada. He was tried in absentia and given a four month jail sentence. He now lives in Washington DC.

Iranian cartoonist Nikahang Kowsar 

In 2009, he founded a blog called Khodnevis (Farsi for "pen"). The source of funding for this project isn't known for certain. But Iranian-Americans have speculated that they may come from both the U.S. and Canadian governments. Though Kowsar began his career as a reformer, his new website quickly became a home for ardent opponents of the Iranian regime. It supported western economic sanctions against Iran. Even those advocating violent regime change have found a home there.

 Kosar cartoon

Kowsar has also become a critic of his former reformist allies in Iran. He called for boycotting the recent Iranian elections and attacked the reformers for offering election slates. He has also attacked the Iranian nuclear deal and those Iranian-Americans (NIAC among them) who advocated it.

In 2010, Kowsar published a tape recording he made secretly of a conversation between him and the son of Hashemi Rafsanjani. The father began his career as an ally of Ayatollah Khomeini, founder of the Islamic Republic, and later become a chief leader of the reformers. The attacks which the son levelled against Ayatollah Khamenei in the tape landed him in jail for a 15 year prison sentence.

Iranians I spoke with believe Kowsar hates the Iranian regime so much, he hopes the hardliners will come to power. Then, it will be that much easier to promote a western attack on Iran that would topple the regime. So in a terribly perverse way, his interests coincide with those of the hardliners.

In the course of interviewing Iranian sources for this profile, one told me that the author "Shirazi" approached him with questions about the Namazi family. In the course of the e mails that went back and forth, "Shirazi" slipped up and forgot to use his fake e mail address. Instead, he used his real email address and name: Nikahang Kowsar.

As with so many of Michael Weiss' projects, he thrives on ominous conspiracies involving authoritarian regimes supposedly inimical to those western values he holds so dear. The very idea of peace and harmony between one such regime, Iran, and the U.S. causes Weiss to gnash his teeth in despair.

Unlikely Alliance Between U.S. Neocons and Iranian Hardliners to Sabotage U.S.-Iran Relations

The most profound irony of the entire episode is that a group of neocon polemicists, in an attempt to defame NIAC, have used the Namazi family as a sacrificial goat. The parallel force on the Iranian side, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and other hardliners, have exploited this struggle for their own purposes.

These Iranian forces are threatened both by the P5+1 nuclear deal and the recent victory of Pres. Rouhani and the moderate coalition which trounced the conservatives in recent elections for the Majlis. As a result, the hardliners worry that their power and influence may be waning. When a beast is wounded it seeks to lash out in order to avenge those who attacked it.

It's also ironic that both Kowsar and the Iranian hardliners detest NIAC, and for similar reasons. They each detest the nuclear agreement as they detest any rapprochement in relations between Iran and the west. Inside Iran, the extremists even call NIAC and figures like Siamak "infiltrators." As if they seek to inveigle themselves into Iranian society and infect with a western poison.

Hardliners must plant fear and suspicions in the minds of the public that the ways of the reformers are dangerous. One way to do this is to pick a symbol of reform and mercilessly attack it. That is how Siamak Namazi was ensnared. Before his arrest he worked for the Dubai-based, Crescent Petroleum. Undoubtedly, one of his jobs was to set up deals with the Iranian oil industry, which had recently become free to sell oil to foreign companies. Thousands of businesspeople from scores of nations have stampeded to Iran to make similar deals.

But the Iranian hardliners benefited enormously from the decades of sanctions. They replaced all those corporations which abandoned Iran and cornered the market on formerly imported goods. With the resumption of free trade, these monopolies are under threat.

What better way to fight back against the new economic order than by showing that the foreigners are shady characters seeking to undermine the Islamic Revolution? That is why they trapped Namazi in their net.

Iran's leader himself said, according to Reuters:

"Iran's economy had not yet benefited from the Western delegations visiting Iran after the lifting of sanctions as they had failed to deliver on their promises. He added he saw some of the visits as suspicious as the West was trying to send 'infiltrators' in disguise."

Photo from Fars News showing Baquer Namazi, then governor of Shiraz province, kissing the Shah's hand

Add to this, ominous photos which hardliners published after Namazi's arrest. They pictured his father, who was a provincial governor of Shiraz under the Shah, kissing the Shah's hand. Speaking of Shiraz, it's no accident that the pseudonymous Daily Beast author chose "Shiraz" for his last name. This is the city and province from which the Namazi family hails.

Haleh Esfandiari, the founder of the Middle East program at the Woodrow Wilson Center, knows Siamak personally and offered her own analysis of the underlying reasons for his arrest:

…Remarks by authorities and members of Iran's parliament suggest that the Intelligence Ministry wishes to implicate Siamak Namazi in a supposed U.S. plot to infiltrate and undermine the Islamic Republic by promoting business exchanges between Iran and the U.S. Iranian authorities have not produced a shred of evidence to support this fantastical idea. Nor has a coerced confession yet surfaced.

…Iran's Intelligence Ministry, and its enablers in the judiciary, have been desperate to prove that the U.S. is scheming against the Islamic Republic through various means, including cultural and business penetration. A recent warning by Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, about supposed U.S. tactics appears to have prompted intelligence officials to redouble their efforts. The end result is that innocent men and women are treated cruelly to satisfy security authorities' whims; if a young man cannot be coerced into a false confession, then his father must be used as leverage.

Anyone who knows the Namazis would dismiss out of hand claims that they were working to undermine the Islamic Republic. Both men who have been arrested are Iranian patriots. Siamak Namazi was not a political activist. He is a World Economic Forum Young Global Leader who believed in building bridges and engagement between Iran and the West, including the United States.

Esfandiari also offers a profile of the decades-worth of extraordinary humanitarian work performed by Baquer Namazi, Siamak's 80 year-old father. He led a completely apolitical life after the Revolution. He went into exile and became a senior official for UNICEF. The agency, in fact, has released a statement in his support and asking for his immediate release:

In its appeal, UNICEF noted his commitment to children and his "spiritual courage and moral convictions." As a UNICEF representative, Namazi survived a 1994 shooting in southern Egypt targeting a U.N. convoy that killed five people.

"Mr. Namazi dedicated many years of his career to improving the lives of some of the world's most disadvantaged and vulnerable children, often working in difficult and even dangerous circumstances," the statement released Thursday said.

The elder Namazi is long retired and poses no threat to anyone. But for members of the clerical regime, afraid of losing power and perks, even an old man offers leverage they may exploit to extract a confession from Siamak.

Perhaps the ultimate irony of this affair is that Michael Weiss and his neocon comrades, in their desperation to sabotage U.S.-Iran relations have made common cause with the most hardline and vicious of Iran’s clerical regime. They make for very strange bedfellows.

One can only hope that leaders on both sides will see reason and negotiate for Siamak's release. His ongoing imprisonment harms bilateral relations and holds them hostage to the whims of marginal extremists on both sides. As Esfandiari wrote:

…President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Javad Zarif have sought to secure Western goodwill toward their country. Will they take responsibility for the fate of those who placed confidence in their bridge-building with the outside world? Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is the only person who can stop the Intelligence Ministry's overreach. Will they persuade the supreme leader to intervene on behalf of the Namazis?

In preparing this article, I contacted the National Review, CNN, Kowsar, and Weiss himself for comment on various matters raised here. None responded to my inquiries.


[1] In the interest of full disclosure, I first came to know Michael Weiss in 2007, after he commissioned a week’s worth of blog posts from me in 2007. He asked if I’d be willing to move my blog, Tikun Olam, to the Jewcy site. After I expressed interest and asked for further details, he promised an agreement would be drafted for my review.

Then I waited…and waited. After several months, it became clear that there would be no agreement forthcoming. Needless to say, it was an inauspicious start and end of a publishing relationship.

By the next year Weiss had left Jewcy and moved to Britain. By 2009, Jewcy's founder and leading funder abandoned the venture. It later became a subsidiary of Tablet Magazine, which is funded by the pro-Israel Likudist Jewish Avi Chai and Kesher Foundations.

Even though the article below is republished here, it doesn't mean The Daily Beast is being endorsed. What is being presented here is using this article from the Daily Beast as evidence of how Jews have used Islam to destroy Christianity. This article below from The Daily Beast with Michael Weiss as the Daily Beast's senior editor clearly demonstrates how cleverly Weiss edits articles and material coming into the Daily Beast for publication. If we now consider that Jews have worked with Islam to destroy Christianity, isn't this further evidence of this?

To completely understand what his going on here it is highly recommended readers go to the last article published below, and after clicking on the link to The Daily Stormer, listen to the brief interview between Sven Longshanks of Aryan Radio and Matthew Raphael Johnson to further comprehend what is going on here between Jews and Islam.

Source: TheDailyBeast 

ISIS Orders Its Franchises to Kill Christians 

The coup that replaced Boko Haram's leader puts the ISIS subsidiary's focus on killing Christians in hopes it can unite, expand, and endure. 

by Philip Obaji Jr.


August 18, 2016

WARRI, Nigeria — The so-called Islamic State has different strategies in different parts of the world, but in Africa and in Europe, certainly, its core objective is becoming clear: to kill Christians. Its long-term goal: to provoke a new Crusade, reviving the holy wars of many hundreds of years ago in the belief that this time around Islam will win.

In practical terms, this focus on a single pervasive, easily targeted enemy is useful to a "caliphate" under pressure that is trying to keep its troops in line.

The way ISIS has handled its Nigerian disciples in the terror organization called Boko Haram, best known for kidnapping girls and using women and children as suicide bombers, is a perfect case in point.

Earlier this month, a man named Abu Musab al-Barnawi announced that he had taken over the infamous Boko Haram organization. And his first message as Boko Haram's leader was as clear as it was concise—on his watch, the group's main focus will be killing Christians.

According to an interview published this month by the self-proclaimed Islamic State group (ISIS), al-Barnawi threatened to bomb churches and kill Christians, but will no longer attack places used by Muslims.

The man described as the new wali, or governor, of ISIS West Africa Province (as Boko Haram wants to be known), said there is a plot by the Western nations to Christianize the region and also claimed that charity organizations are being used to achieve this, according to an interview published in the Islamic State newspaper al-Nabaa and translated by SITE Intelligence Group.

"They strongly seek to Christianize the society," he said of these charities. "They exploit the condition of those who are displaced under the raging war, providing them with food and shelter and then Christianizing their children."

The man who now runs Boko Haram said the group will deal with Christians by "booby-trapping and blowing up every church that we are able to reach, and killing all of those who we find from the citizens of the cross."

Not only were al-Barnawi's intentions clear, his agenda for Boko Haram also appears to be a clear script written by ISIS, to whom he answers. The new leader will be expected to deliver results that his predecessor, Abubakar Shekau, failed to achieve.

When Boko Haram under Shekau's leadership pledged allegiance to ISIS last year, it looked like the group would adopt ISIS modus operandi and embrace its ultimate goal to lead Muslims toward an apocalyptic battle against "infidels," and eventually create a unified, Muslim territory where it would enforce its extremist beliefs. But that didn't turn out to be the case.

While ISIS, with a precise goal of gaining and inspiring its followers, developed strategies of achieving its aim, including citing the Quran in shaping its vision, and referencing the words of the Prophet in its statements, most of which it released on its well packaged online magazine, Dabiq, Boko Haram on the other hand showed it was a loosely organized group with militants lacking in strategy and erratic in behavior as it began to focus its attacks on the same Muslims it needed to inspire and recruit.

In recent months, rumors began to fly that Shekau had run into problems with the leadership of ISIS for his failure to obey its guidance.

In June, U.S. Marine Lt. Gen. Thomas Waldhauser, the nominee to lead the U.S. military's Africa Command, told a congressional hearing that Boko Haram have fractured internally, with a big group splitting away from Shekau over his failure to heed to instructions from ISIS, including ignoring calls to stop using children as suicide bombers.

"He's been told by ISIL to stop doing that," Waldhauser said, using the U.S. government's preferred acronym for Islamic State at his nomination hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee. "But he has not done so. And that's one of the reasons why this splinter group has broken off."

"What concerns me is the breakoff group of Boko Haram who wants to be more ISIL-like," said Waldhauser, "and consequently buy into the ISIL-brand of attacking Western interests."

Daily DigestStart and finish your day with the top stories from The Daily Beast. Cheat SheetA speedy, smart summary of all the news you need to know (and nothing you don't). By clicking "Subscribe," you agree to have read the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Boko Haram has lost ground to a more determined Nigerian military in recent months, and without territory it loses some of its draw for new recruits, but al-Barnawi's anti-Christian focus is tried and tested by his mentors in the "caliphate," who want to keep the Nigerian conflict turned up to a full boil.

Al-Barnawi's anti-Christian rhetoric is already the focus of ISIS in Europe. On the day he was announced as Boko Haram's new leader, ISIS used the latest issue of Dabiq to paint Christianity as a "false" religion and Christians as "cross worshippers." It encouraged Muslims to attack churches in a ways similar to the atrocity in France last month, where two men entered a Catholic church in small town Normandy, slit the throat of an 86-year-old priest, and gravely wounded a nun.

ISIS has proven in the past that it is capable of following up on its warnings, and determined to do so, is why the threats by the leader of its so-called West Africa province must be taken seriously.

Before the Normandy attack, ISIS, in the fifth issue of its slick French-language magazine, Dar al-Islam, which came out last summer, listed French churches as targets in a campaign "to create fear in their hearts," according to a CNN report last month.

The group's planned attack on a church in Villejuif in the Paris area in April 2015 was thwarted by French police after the man who was supposed to carry out the operation accidentally shot himself in the leg. But after failing in Villejuif, it returned to carry out the murder in Normandy, showing it can hit where it said it's going to hit—at a church. It is threatening to do the same in cities like London and Washington, D.C., and now in West Africa. With the Normandy attack, it was trying to prove to the world that it can do what it says it will do.

The Christians of the Middle East, though a minority, and a dwindling one in many places, are targeted as well. In June, an Egyptian affiliate of the Islamic State group claimed responsibility for the murder of a priest in the Sinai Peninsula where it operates, describing him as a "disbelieving combatant," in a way ISIS often describes non-Muslims.

ISIS has set an ambitious goal of fighting until "disbelievers" accept its options of conversion, submission by paying the infidel tax (jizyah), or death, and its removal of Shekau as Boko Haram leader is a clear indication that it wants its jihad to expand until "it covers all eastern and western extents of the Earth," as it puts it in the fifth issue of Dabiq. In its home base straddling parts of Iraq and Syria, ISIS has persecuted all supposed infidels, including Yazidis—condemned as pagans and murdered or sold into slavery—as well as Christians.

This new global emphasis on "cross worshippers" is a return to the group's jihadist roots, harking back to the 1998 declaration by Osama bin Laden, Ayman Zawahiri and others that they would wage war on "Crusaders and Jews" around the world. A return to fundamentals is often the strategy of an organization trying to regain focus and rationalize its structure.

"It wouldn't be easy for al-Barnawi to operate in the state at which Boko Haram is at the moment," said Ushie Michael, a prominent Nigerian security analyst who has been following the activities of the group right from inception. "Shekau still has his faction, and there is most likely going to be a clash between both groups."

As ISIS seeks to reposition Boko Haram, Shekau disagrees with the new arrangement, and as a recording purportedly from him suggests, the former leader—who described al-Barnawi as "an infidel" preaching "false creeds"—sees the announcement of a new head of the sect as a coup.

"At the beginning of these exchanges [with ISIS], I was deceived. I was made to articulate my beliefs in writing, but this was rejected," Shekau said.

As things stand, Shekau has lost control of what remains of Boko Haram, and whether or not he agrees with this new development, it doesn't change what ISIS intends to do. To achieve its ultimate ambition of securing a global caliphate through a global war, it must keep its recruits—whether in the field in the Middle East, or fighting as part of subsidiaries in Africa, or as "lone wolves" in Europe—focused on the enemy that's at hand: Christians.

Source: The Daily Stormer

The Daily Traditionalist: The Ancient Alliance of Islam and Jewry

August 16, 2016

Dr Matthew Raphael Johnson joins Sven Longshanks to talk about the ancient alliance between Islam and Jewry for Tuesday's edition of The Daily Traditionalist. He begins by relating the tale of Samuel ibn Naghrillah, a Jew who was favored by the Moslem's in Islamic Spain and given the highest position in society. The Moslem leaders would use the Jews as tax farmers, the same as the monarchy's in Europe did, only in Islamic countries the Jews would not start revolutions like they do in the Christian ones. This particular Jew's son was so wicked to the people that he was tax farming, that they rose up and crucified him.

This leads to a conversation on the parallels between Judaism and Islam. Matt fails to see any difference between the two and Sven points out that both encourage the abuse of non-Moslems and non-Jews. The idea that Islam is opposed to Jewry is a modern idea, promoted by anti-Zionists who only see the Jews of Israel as being a problem. Matt shows that once you dig a little bit deeper, you can see that the Islamic terrorist groups are all linked to the Jews. ISIS fighters get treated in Israeli hospitals and Israel's foreign minister has said that he would rather have an Islamic state in Syria than a secular one under Bashar al Assad. Even the origins of Wahhabi Islam go back to just after the first world war and the Jew-controlled intelligence services of the West.

The Jews today are at the forefront of encouraging Islamic immigration into Europe and America and they are quite open about this. Matt likens this to Hoffman's 'Revelation of the Method' where the enemy gets to be so powerful that he can operate out in the open with no fear of being challenged. This serves two purposes, it demoralises the victim and makes it him give up all hope of resistance.

This is why it is so encouraging to see Trump accusing Obama and Clinton of founding ISIS. It is quite obvious that the wars in the Middle East and the funding of terrorist groups to take down Gaddafi and Assad led to the formation of ISIS, yet no mainstream politician has dared to say this before. Even if he is not going as far as identifying the oligarchs behind Clinton and Obama, they are the public representation of them and by calling them out as he has, he has broken the mainstream silence on this subject.

Presented by Sven Longshanks and Matt Johnson

The Daily Traditionalist: The Ancient Alliance of Islam and Jewry – DT 081616

javascript:; Download (31:28)

What Will Happen When Jews Rule The World ? Amazing Facts 

Russian orthodox chant Chesnokov "We Praise Thee"

The Religion Of Vladimir Putin 

Further reading:

George Soros attacks Putin's Party: Media Smear campaign in Duma Elections

George Soros Group Funded "Opposition Research" On Critics of Radical Terrorist Ideologies

Michael Weiss, the Neocon's Neocon

No comments:

Post a Comment

Who's visiting Abel Danger
view a larger version of the map below at