time to take off the blinders - 7/7 2005 London Bombings - dead peasant life insurance - cut & paste CCTV image - reduction in carbon foot print

"[Evidence Crown Agents Sisters have access to Sohonet-style command centers needed to create fake news of snuff-film murder of potential whistleblowers] .. Assistant Commissioner Cressida Dick, QPM (born 1960) is a senior officer in London's Metropolitan Police. Before 2005 she attracted little media attention, but became well-known as having been the officer in command of the operation which led to the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes. In June 2009, she was promoted to the rank of Assistant Commissioner, the first woman to hold this rank substantively. She holds the Queen's Police Medal for distinguished service Early life The officer is third and youngest child of Cecilia Dick (née Buxton), an Oxford historian and Marcus William Dick , Senior Tutor at Balliol College Oxford and later Professor of Philosophy university of East Anglia [Home of the AGW scam]. She was born and raised in Oxford and educated at The Dragon School (Oxford), Oxford High School and Balliol College, Oxford. Before joining the police force, she had worked in a fish and chip shop and in a large accountancy firm [KPMG?]. Police career In 1983, she joined the Metropolitan Police as a Constable. In 1993, she joined the staff of the Accelerated Promotion Course at Bramshill Police College, and in 1995, joined Thames Valley Police as a Superintendent. She was Superintendent Operations at Oxford, and later, as a Chief Superintendent, served as Area Commander in Oxford for three years. She completed the Strategic Command Course in 2000 and was awarded a Master of Philosophy degree in Criminology from the University of Cambridge, in 2001, with the highest grade of her class. In June 2001, she returned to the Metropolitan Police as a Commander where she was head of the Diversity Directorate until 2003. She then became the head of Operation Trident, which investigates gun crimes within London's black community. In the immediate aftermath of 21 July 2005 London bombings, she was the Gold Commander in the control room during the operation which led to the death of the Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes, mistakenly identified as a suicide bomber, on 22 July 2005. In September 2006, the Metropolitan Police Authority announced her promotion to the rank of Deputy Assistant Commissioner Specialist Operations and on 30 June 2009 the Metropolitan Police Authority announced her promotion to Assistant Commissioner in charge of Specialist Crime. According to a BBC radio documentary, she is a supporter of the charity Common Purpose UK."



Digital Picture Anomalies:

1) Look carefully at the haversack being carried over the right shoulder of the person on the far right and it can be observed it is very crudely done and is obvious.

2) The same person on the far right in the picture with the haversack doesn't have a left leg. How is this person walking?

3) The person in the middle in the background with the white cap: the upper iron bar should be behind his head, not in front of it. His face cannot be seen.

4) The same person with the white cap; look carefully at the second bar down: it doesn't line up on the left and on the right.

5) The third bar down on the railing doesn't line up either.

6) The face of the person in the middle center is darkened and is impossible to make out.

7) The same person in the middle has a large foot with a white 'halo' around it. Why would this be?

8) Look carefully at the nose of the person on the left about to walk into the open door. Why the big white square looking nose?

Conclusion: The image above is a manipulated picture of the four suspects in a cut and paste of a CCTV image.

It is alleged the BBC Pension Trust managers' investments in carbon offsets and dead-peasant life insurance were activated by the bombings in London on July 7, 2005; were TETRA communications utilized to arbitrage 'incidents' such as the London Underground (LU) bombing during the Elsevier exercise? TETRA data transmissions from the simulated (?) crime scene would have shown BBC arbitrageurs or hedge fund managers how risk-reward ratios changed with CO2 concentrations; an empirical indication of how crowded the carriages were.

It should be considered how BBC's Paul Reynolds attributed 7/7 to al-Qaeda but made no mention of the LU bombing exercise staged for Elsevier, the BBC's co-conspirator in the climate change scam.

"Bomber video 'points to al-Qaeda' By Paul Reynolds BBC world affairs correspondent A video statement from one of the London suicide bombers Mohammad Sidique Khan strongly suggests a link between the bombers and al-Qaeda, which has not been established before."

"Peter Power Divulges It Was Reed Elsevier He Was Working For On 7/7 Posted on May 7, 2009 by Clare Swinney By Clare Swinney, April 7th 2009 Peter Power of Visor Consultants, who openly admitted during a BBC interview shortly after the London bombings of July the 7th 2005, that he was running an exercise for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where the 7/7 bombings occurred, has disclosed that the company he was working for was Reed Elsevier. On April the 6th, in response to a news item and a short blog related to the 7/7 bombings that were posted on the Uncensored website, he stated in the comment section that in 2005 Reed Elsevier asked Visor Consultants to prepare an effective crisis management plan and rehearse, and he wrote that: ” Several draft scenarios were drawn up and the crisis team themselves set the exercise date and time: 9.00am on 7 July…”. So what is Reed Elsevier known for? Their website shows that the company invests heavily in disseminating information across the globe, describing itself as a world leading provider of professional information and online work flow solutions in the science, medical, legal, risk information and analytics, and business sectors, as well as being one of the world’s largest media companies. It owns a wide variety of companies and publications, from LexisNexis to Gray’s Anatomy and New Scientist magazine. It promotes the unfounded notion that climate change is a threat and hails support for the United Nations Global Compact, and its activities are as diverse as funding medical facilities in the developing world, to hosting meetings to discuss designing a transatlantic agenda."

When the bombs went off as registered in data transmissions on TETRA, BBC and Elsevier, did investors in this arbitraged 'incident' automatically file their dead-peasant life insurance claims calculated partly on the value of the reduction in carbon footprint of the dead-peasants?

This would have been a very efficient killing considering that many of the pre-dead-peasants would have been paying BBC license fees to finance the outside broadcast teams which span the story of what killed them.

"Foreign Press Foundation "DEAD PEASANT'' LIFE INSURANCES: YOU TOO ? Thu Jan 6, 2005 11:37 213.93.189.198 "How much are you really worth to your employer? The answer to that question may depend on whether you're alive or dead. Some news reports have revealed that still many large companies purchase so-called "Dead Peasant" life insurance policies on low wage employees, without their consent or knowledge. When the employees die, their families receive nothing. Instead, the companies reap the benefits, and in some cases use the money to fund compensation packages for high level executives."

Source: July 7th Truth Campaign

A Call for July 7th Truth & Justice

This site was set-up following the London bombings on 7 July 2005 with the aim of getting to the truth about what really happened on the day that 56 people were killed and over 700 injured on London transport. Initial train operating company reports on the day announced the devastation on the Underground was the result of a 'power surge', and this continued to be reported until shortly after the explosion of a number 30 bus in Tavistock Square at 9.47am. After the bus incident a very different version of events began to unfold, involving everything from military grade explosives with timers or remote detonators, placed on, or under, train floors, right through to highly-volatile, home-made explosives allegedly carried by four young British men.

Five years on from the events that this site endeavours to examine and the debate about 7/7 now hinges on whether or not there should be an independent public inquiry. Or, whether a flimsy, shoddily researched, factually incorrect, and anonymously penned and published document that sketches an outline of the official story [PDF] should suffice as an explanation for how 56 lives were taken. To date, and despite the release of some CCTV footage purporting to be from the day of 7 July 2005, not one piece of evidence has been released to the public that could be legitimately used to convict someone in a court of law for what happened, yet the government still has no plans to organise an Independent Public Inquiry and "families of July 7 bombing victims fear they may never learn the truth".

Inquests Begin

7/7 Inquest blog